Birth weight, neonatal care, and infant mortality: Evidence from macrosomic babies

Ylenia Brilli1, Brandon J Restrepo2

  • 1Department of Economics, University of Verona, Via Cantarane 24, 37129 Verona, Italy; Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Vasagatan 1, SE 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden; CHEGU, Sweden; CHILD-Collegio Carlo Alberto, Italy.

Insights

Rule-of-thumb decisions impact neonatal care for high-birth-weight infants. Infants over 5000 grams receive more intensive care and experience reduced mortality, suggesting targeted interventions improve outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Health Economics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Macrosomic newborns (extremely high birth weight) present unique challenges in healthcare allocation.
  • Understanding the impact of birth weight thresholds on neonatal care utilization and outcomes is crucial for evidence-based practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate rule-of-thumb health treatment decision-making for macrosomic newborns.
  • To estimate the short-run health returns of neonatal intensive care for infants at the upper end of the birth weight distribution.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a regression discontinuity design to analyze treatment assignment and health outcomes.
  • Compared infants just above and below a 5000-gram birth weight threshold.

Main Results:

  • Infants exceeding 5000 grams showed a 2% higher likelihood of neonatal intensive care unit admission and a 1% higher probability of receiving antibiotics.
  • Birth weight above 5000 grams was associated with a 0.15% lower risk of first-week mortality and a 0.20% lower risk of first-month mortality.
  • No significant changes in treatment or mortality were observed at lower macrosomic cutoffs.

Conclusions:

  • Treatment decisions for macrosomic infants appear guided by a 5000-gram threshold, reflecting perceived risks.
  • The 5000-gram cutoff demonstrates a positive health return in terms of reduced mortality for high-birth-weight infants.