Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025
Sagittal Plane Kinematic Gait Analysis in C57BL/6 Mice Subjected to MOG35-55 Induced Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
Published on: November 4, 2017
Kinematic, kinetic, and musculoskeletal modeling analysis of gait in patients with cervical myelopathy using a
Ippei Kitade1, Hideaki Nakajima2, Ai Takahashi3
1Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Fukui Hospital, 23-3, Shimoaizuki, Matsuoka, Eiheiji-cho, Yoshida-gun, Fukui 910-1193, Japan.
Background Context:
Although a few reports have shown a change in gait motion in cervical myelopathy (CM) patients using a three-dimensional (3D) gait analysis system, there has been no detailed quantitative investigation of their gait including musculoskeletal modeling parameters. Also, 3D gait analysis using a classification of severity has not been substantiated.
Purpose:
This study aimed to investigate kinematic, kinetic, and musculoskeletal modeling parameters of gait motion in CM patients using a severity classification.
Study Design:
Prospective cohort and cross-sectional study.
Patient Sample:
Forty-two patients with CM and 40 healthy, age-matched volunteers.
Outcome Measures:
Lower extremity spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic, and musculoskeletal modeling parameters.
Methods:
Subjects were classified as to its severity using the Japan Orthopaedic Association score excluding the upper extremity items: group 1 (>10 points); group 2 (7-9 points); and group 3 (<6 points). A 3D motion analysis system and musculoskeletal modeling software were used to obtain the spatiotemporal, kinematic (the lower extremity joints angles in the sagittal plane), kinetic (the lower extremity joints moment and power in the sagittal plane), and musculoskeletal modeling parameters (the muscle-tendon length and velocity).
Results:
Genu recurvatum, deteriorated lower-extremity joint motion, and muscle-tendon velocity were observed in severe CM patients (group 3). Muscle-tendon velocities of the long head of the biceps femoris in controls and mild CM patients (groups 1 and 2) showed a bimodal waveform in the negative direction during the initial contact and preswing phases, whereas these characteristics were not present in severe CM patients (group 3).
Conclusions:
The strategies of the knee joint moment during gait motion in severe CM patients were different from those of the normal gait pattern. The imbalance between agonist and antagonist muscle tissue during gait could be involved in the occurrence of genu recurvatum. It might be important for CM patients to consider improving the contraction or extension velocity of the biceps femoris muscle during each gait phase from the early stages of symptoms.
