Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Volume Segmentation and Analysis of Biological Materials Using SuRVoS Super-region Volume Segmentation Workbench
Published on: August 23, 2017
Segmentation of breast ultrasound image with semantic classification of superpixels
Qinghua Huang1, Yonghao Huang2, Yaozhong Luo2
1School of Mechanical Engineering, and Center for OPTical IMagery Analysis and Learning (OPTIMAL), Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China; Center for OPTical IMagery Analysis and Learning (OPTIMAL), Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China.
Abstract:
Breast cancer is a great threat to females. Ultrasound imaging has been applied extensively in diagnosis of breast cancer. Due to the poor image quality, segmentation of breast ultrasound (BUS) image remains a very challenging task. Besides, BUS image segmentation is a crucial step for further analysis. In this paper, we proposed a novel method to segment the breast tumor via semantic classification and merging patches. The proposed method firstly selects two diagonal points to crop a region of interest (ROI) on the original image. Then, histogram equalization, bilateral filter and pyramid mean shift filter are adopted to enhance the image. The cropped image is divided into many superpixels using simple linear iterative clustering (SLIC). Furthermore, some features are extracted from the superpixels and a bag-of-words model can be created. The initial classification can be obtained by a back propagation neural network (BPNN). To refine preliminary result, k-nearest neighbor (KNN) is used for reclassification and the final result is achieved. To verify the proposed method, we collected a BUS dataset containing 320 cases. The segmentation results of our method have been compared with the corresponding results obtained by five existing approaches. The experimental results show that our method achieved competitive results compared to conventional methods in terms of TP and FP, and produced good approximations to the hand-labelled tumor contours with comprehensive consideration of all metrics (the F1-score = 89.87% ± 4.05%, and the average radial error = 9.95% ± 4.42%).
More Related Videos
09:21Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images
Published on: February 18, 2015
04:48Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
Published on: November 30, 2022