Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025
Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
Crestal bone response to loaded zirconia and titanium implants: a radiographic and histometric analysis in canines
Corinne E Oeschger1,2, Dieter D Bosshardt3, Stefan Roehling4,5,6
1Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Objectives:
To evaluate the crestal bone response to a two-piece zirconia implant compared with a control titanium implant using periapical radiographs (PAs) and histometry.
Materials And Methods:
Thirty zirconia and 30 titanium implants were placed in healed posterior mandibles of five canines. Full-ceramic single-tooth restorations were cemented after 6 weeks of healing. Three observers measured the distance between the implant shoulder and the crestal bone (DIB) at placement, loading, and harvesting after 4 or 16 weeks in function. The influence of implant material and loading time on DIB as well as the inter-observer agreement were analyzed. Additionally, histometric distance between implant shoulder and most coronal bone-to-implant contact (IS-cBIC) was compared with DIB.
Results:
Mean DIB values increased between 4 and 16 weeks of loading for both zirconia (from 1.66 to 2.25 mm; P < 0.0001) and titanium (from 1.81 to 1.95 mm; P = 0.06). Zirconia yielded mean IS-cBIC values of 2.18 mm and 2.48 mm (P < 0.001) and titanium 2.23 mm and 2.34 mm (P = 0.27) after 4 and 16 weeks, respectively. The raters reached an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient. PAs underestimated the bone loss on average by 0.39 mm.
Conclusions:
Zirconia implants showed a greater increase of DIB during early healing and function than titanium.
Clinical Relevance:
Crestal peri-implant tissue dimensions may show more pronounced changes around two-piece zirconia implants during early healing. PAs may underestimate peri-implant bone loss.
