Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Coronary-Bronchial Artery Fistulas: Pathophysiology, Multimodality Imaging, and Contemporary Management.

Journal of cardiovascular development and disease·2026

Same author

Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: Navigating Diagnostic Pathways and Therapeutic Crossroads Between Invasive and Conservative Strategies.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026

Same author

Use of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation as a Support During Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Safety and Feasibility.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025

Same author

Peri-Procedural Management of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from the PERSEO Multicenter Registry.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2025

Same author

Predictors of target lesion failure after treatment of left main, bifurcation, or chronic total occlusion lesions with ultrathin-strut drug-eluting coronary stents in the ULTRA registry.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2023

Same author

Acute coronary syndrome in very elderly patients-a real-world experience.

Heart and vessels·2023

Same journal

Same-Day Discharge After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Who, When, and How?

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2026

Same journal

Comparative Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2026

Same journal

Validation of the European Society of Cardiology Ischemic and Bleeding Risk Criteria for Risk Stratification After Endovascular Therapy in Japanese Patients With Lower Extremity Artery Disease.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2026

Same journal

When Size Matters: Advanced Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Caused by a Large Snake-Like Thrombus.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2026

Same journal

One Anatomy, Multiple Valve Choices: Interobserver Agreement in Selecting Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2026

Same journal

Novel Application of the Jailed Balloon Anchor Technique to Improve Guiding Catheter Stability During Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Ostial Coronary Stenting.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold

Published on: October 23, 2015

Bioresorbable scaffold: Never say never.

Giuseppe Musumeci¹, Giorgio Baralis¹

¹SC Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera S Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions

|February 9, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) show promise but clinical trials reveal higher risks of heart attack and stent thrombosis compared to drug-eluting stents.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Use of Apple-Derived Cellulose Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Use of Apple-Derived Cellulose Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Published on: February 23, 2024

Bioinspired Soft Robot with Incorporated Microelectrodes

Bioinspired Soft Robot with Incorporated Microelectrodes

Published on: February 28, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold

Published on: October 23, 2015

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Use of Apple-Derived Cellulose Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Author Spotlight: Insights into the Use of Apple-Derived Cellulose Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Published on: February 23, 2024

Bioinspired Soft Robot with Incorporated Microelectrodes

Bioinspired Soft Robot with Incorporated Microelectrodes

Published on: February 28, 2020

Area of Science:

Cardiovascular research
Biomaterials science
Medical device engineering

Background:

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) were developed to address limitations associated with traditional metallic stents.
The Absorb BVS specifically has been evaluated for its strut thickness, degradation profile, and effects on vessel wall coverage and thrombosis.
Understanding these factors is crucial for assessing BVS performance and safety.

Discussion:

Clinical investigations indicate elevated rates of target vessel myocardial infarction (MI) associated with the Absorb BVS.
Higher incidences of stent thrombosis have also been reported for Absorb BVS compared to contemporary metallic stents.
These findings necessitate a careful evaluation of BVS technology in clinical practice.

Key Insights:

The Absorb BVS, despite its design intent, has demonstrated concerning clinical outcomes.
Comparisons with second-generation drug-eluting stents reveal a less favorable safety profile for Absorb BVS.
Thrombotic events and myocardial infarction are significant risks associated with this scaffold.

Outlook:

Further research is needed to optimize BVS design and material properties to mitigate thrombotic risks.
Long-term clinical surveillance is essential to fully understand the safety and efficacy of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
Development of next-generation scaffolds should prioritize improved hemocompatibility and reduced inflammatory responses.