Related Experiment Videos
Cardiac implantable electrical devices in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: single center implant data
Cinzia Valzania1, Fredrik Gadler2,3, Giuseppe Boriani4
1Department of Cardiology, S.Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Insights
This study analyzed cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) first implants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) were more common than pacemakers, with distinct patient profiles for each device type.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a significant condition requiring cardiac rhythm management.
- Cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs) play a crucial role in managing arrhythmias and heart failure in HCM patients.
- Understanding implantation trends and patient characteristics is vital for optimizing care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the trends and characteristics of first-time CIED implants in patients diagnosed with HCM.
- To compare the demographic and clinical profiles of HCM patients receiving pacemakers versus implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).
- To analyze the utilization of different CIED types, including pacemakers, ICDs, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of clinical and technical data from a Swedish tertiary university hospital (Karolinska University Hospital) between 2005 and 2016.
- Data extracted from the Swedish Pacemaker and ICD Registry, supplemented with echocardiographic data.
- Inclusion criteria focused on patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy undergoing first-time CIED implantation.
Main Results:
- A total of 70 first pacemaker implants and 99 first ICD implants were performed in HCM patients.
- ICDs constituted 59% of all CIED first implants in this cohort.
- Pacemaker recipients were older (mean age 71 years) and evenly distributed by gender, while ICD recipients were younger (mean age 53 years) and predominantly male (70%).
- A significant proportion of ICDs (66%) were implanted for primary prevention.
- Obstructive HCM was noted in 47% of pacemaker patients and 25% of ICD patients with available pre-implant echocardiograms.
Conclusions:
- CIED first implants in HCM patients show distinct epidemiological and clinical profiles depending on the device type (pacemaker vs. ICD).
- ICDs were the predominant CIED implanted in this HCM cohort.
- This study highlights the importance of tailored device selection and management strategies for HCM patients requiring CIEDs.
Abstract:
Objectives: To investigate cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) first implants in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in a Swedish tertiary university hospital. Design: Clinical and technical data on pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) first implants performed in HCM patients at the Karolinska University Hospital from 2005 to 2016 were extracted from the Swedish Pacemaker and ICD Registry. Echocardiographic data were obtained by review of hospital recordings. Results: The number of first pacemaker implants in HCM patients was 70 (1.5% of total pacemaker implants). The mean age of HCM pacemaker patients was 71 ± 10 years. Pacemaker implants were almost uniformly distributed between genders. Dual-chamber pacemakers with or without CRT properties were prevalent (6 and 93%, respectively). The number of first ICD implants in HCM patients was 99 (5.1% of total ICD implants). HCM patients receiving an ICD were 53 ± 15 years and prevalently men (70%). Sixty-five (66%) patients were implanted for primary prevention. Dual-chamber ICDs with or without CRT were 21 and 65%, respectively. Obstructive HCM was present in 47% pacemaker patients and 25% ICD patients with available pre-implant echo. Conclusions: This retrospective registry-based study provides a picture of CIED first implants in HCM patients in a Swedish tertiary university hospital. ICDs were the most commonly implanted devices, covering 59% of CIED implants. HCM patients receiving a pacemaker or an ICD had different epidemiological and clinical profiles.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy