Learning Bayesian Posteriors with Neural Networks for Gravitational-Wave Inference
Alvin J K Chua1, Michele Vallisneri1
1Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA.
Physical Review Letters
|February 15, 2020
Summary
We use deep learning to rapidly estimate gravitational-wave source parameters from detector data. This breakthrough accelerates Bayesian inference, enabling faster analysis for gravitational-wave astronomy and future experiments.
Area of Science:
- Astrophysics
- Machine Learning
- Data Science
Background:
- Bayesian inference is crucial for gravitational-wave astronomy but computationally intensive.
- Current methods for parameter estimation can be slow, limiting real-time analysis.
- Deep learning offers potential for accelerating complex scientific computations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a deep learning framework for rapid Bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy.
- To create a neural network that directly outputs posterior distributions for source parameters.
- To enable near-instantaneous parameter estimation from gravitational-wave detector data.
Main Methods:
- Trained a deep neural network to approximate posterior distributions.
- Utilized reduced-order modeling for compact data representation.
- Employed a neural-network waveform interpolant for efficient model generation.
Main Results:
- The deep learning model successfully generates parametrized approximations of posterior distributions.
- The scheme leverages efficient data compression via reduced-order modeling.
- The approach significantly speeds up the Bayesian inference process.
Conclusions:
- This deep learning approach achieves rapid Bayesian inference for gravitational-wave data.
- The method has significant implications for low-latency parameter estimation.
- It will aid in characterizing the scientific potential of future gravitational-wave observatories.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Black Holes
2.5K
Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
2.5K
Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution: Problem Solving
2.8K
Individual molecules in a gas move in random directions, but a gas containing numerous molecules has a predictable distribution of molecular speeds, which is known as the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, f(v).
This distribution function f(v) is defined by saying that the expected number N (v1,v2) of particles with speeds between v1 and v2 is given by
This distribution function f(v) is defined by saying that the expected number N (v1,v2) of particles with speeds between v1 and v2 is given by
2.8K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.2K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
1.6K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.6K
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
205
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
205
Neural Circuits
2.5K
Neural circuits and neuronal pools are two of the main structures found in the nervous system. Neural circuits are networks of neurons that work together to carry out a specific task or process. They consist of interconnected neurons and glial cells, which provide structural and metabolic support.
Neuronal pools are collections of nerve cells with similar functions and interact through chemical and electrical signals. These pools include both interneurons (the central neural circuit nodes that...
Neuronal pools are collections of nerve cells with similar functions and interact through chemical and electrical signals. These pools include both interneurons (the central neural circuit nodes that...
2.5K

