Clinical Evaluation of a Data-Driven Respiratory Gating Algorithm for Whole-Body PET with Continuous Bed Motion
Florian Büther1, Judson Jones2, Robert Seifert3
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany butherf@uni-muenster.de.
Summary
Data-driven gating (DDG) for continuous-bed-motion (CBM) PET scans offers motion compensation comparable to hardware-based belt gating (BG). This new DDG algorithm improves image quality and lesion delineation over static reconstructions in CBM PET/CT imaging.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Medical Imaging
- Radiochemistry
Background:
- Respiratory gating is standard in PET to mitigate motion artifacts.
- Data-driven gating (DDG) is a hardware-free alternative to traditional gating methods like belt gating (BG).
- Continuous-bed-motion (CBM) PET requires specialized DDG approaches for effective motion compensation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate a CBM-capable DDG algorithm for whole-body PET/CT.
- To compare the performance of DDG against BG using optimally gated (OG) and elastic motion correction (EMOCO) reconstructions.
- To evaluate lesion metabolic volume, SUV measurements, and visual delineation quality.
Main Methods:
- Fifty-six patients with suspected thoracic or abdominal malignancies underwent 18F-FDG CBM PET/CT.
- DDG and BG signals were acquired and analyzed for correlation.
- Static, OG, and EMOCO reconstructions were performed for both gating methods.
- Quantitative (SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic volume) and qualitative (lesion delineation) assessments were conducted.
Main Results:
- A moderate global correlation (0.48 ± 0.11) between BG and DDG signals was observed, with higher correlation in visceral regions (0.89 ± 0.07).
- All motion-compensated reconstructions (BG-OG, DDG-OG, BG-EMOCO, DDG-EMOCO) showed significantly higher SUV measurements than static reconstructions (P < 0.001).
- No significant differences in SUV or lesion delineation quality were found between BG and DDG methods within the same reconstruction type (OG or EMOCO).
Conclusions:
- DDG-based motion compensation in CBM PET acquisitions significantly enhances image quality compared to static reconstructions.
- The CBM-capable DDG algorithm provides performance comparable to traditional BG approaches.
- This DDG algorithm represents a valuable, hardware-free alternative for motion compensation in CBM PET systems.


