Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Prostatic-specific antigen density behavior according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging result
Juan Morote1, Anna Celma1, Fernando Diaz1
1Department of Urology, Vall d´Hebron Hospital, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) is a valuable tool for detecting significant prostate cancer (CaP), but its efficacy decreases with higher Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADSv.2) scores. Integrating PSAD with other predictors can personalize biopsy recommendations.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Radiology
- Oncology
Background:
- Prostate cancer (CaP) diagnosis relies on various indicators, including prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).
- The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADSv.2) score categorizes MRI findings, aiding in risk stratification.
- Understanding the interplay between PSAD and PIRADSv.2 is crucial for optimizing diagnostic strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the relationship between prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADSv.2) scores.
- To determine the utility of PSAD in predicting significant prostate cancer (sCaP) across different PIRADSv.2 categories.
- To evaluate the combined diagnostic performance of mpMRI and PSAD for prostate cancer detection.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 952 men with elevated PSA or abnormal DRE underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (PB).
- Men with prior 5-α-reductase inhibitor use or prostate cancer history were excluded; 768 men underwent 3-T mpMRI.
- Significant CaP (sCaP) was defined by International Society of Uropathologist grade or tumor length; PSAD was analyzed against PIRADSv.2 scores and biopsy outcomes.
Main Results:
- Overall CaP detection was 41.7%, with sCaP in 37.4%. sCaP detection rates increased significantly with PIRADSv.2 score (4.3% for <3 to 78.5% for 5).
- PSAD was an independent predictor of sCaP (OR 1.971) and improved mpMRI performance (AUC increased from 0.830 to 0.869).
- PSAD increased with PIRADSv.2 score, but its efficacy in predicting sCaP decreased for PIRADSv.2 scores of 3 and above.
Conclusions:
- The predictive value of PSAD for significant prostate cancer diminishes as PIRADSv.2 scores increase.
- Factors beyond mpMRI and PSAD, such as age and family history, also independently predict sCaP.
- Developing nomograms integrating these predictors is recommended for personalized prostate biopsy decisions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

