Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Sample Preparation and Experimental Design for In Situ Multi-Beam Transmission Electron Microscopy Irradiation Experiments
Published on: June 27, 2022
Modeling the head of PRIMUS linear accelerator for electron-mode at 10 MeV for different applicators
Hani Negm1,2, Moamen M O M Aly3, Walaa M Fathy3
1Physics Department, College of Science, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Monte Carlo (MC) simulation accurately models the Primus linear accelerator head. This validated method precisely estimates energy fluence distribution, percentage depth dose, and beam profiles for clinical applications.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Computational Dosimetry
Background:
- Accurate modeling of linear accelerator (LINAC) heads is crucial for precise radiation therapy dose calculations.
- Monte Carlo (MC) simulations offer a powerful tool for simulating complex radiation transport phenomena.
- Validation of simulation models against experimental data ensures their reliability in clinical settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the use of MC simulation for modeling the Primus LINAC head.
- To estimate key dosimetric parameters including energy fluence distribution (EFD), percentage depth dose (PDD), and beam profiles.
- To assess the accuracy of the simulation for various applicator sizes.
Main Methods:
- The BEAMNRC code, based on EGSNRC, was employed to model the 10 MeV electron beam of the Primus LINAC.
- Simulations were performed for multiple applicator sizes (10x10, 15x15, 20x20 cm2).
- Phase space data from BEAMNRC were used as input for DOSXYZNRC and BEAMDP to calculate EFD, PDD, and beam profiles.
Main Results:
- Excellent agreement was observed between MC simulation results and measured PDD and off-axis dose profiles in a water phantom.
- Key PDD parameters (R100, R90, R80, R50) showed discrepancies <2 mm, with a minor deviation of 6 mm in R100 for the 15x15 cm2 applicator.
- Surface dose discrepancies were <3%, rapidly decreasing to 0% within 2.4 mm, and beam profile differences ranged from 2% to 3%.
Conclusions:
- The MC simulation using the BEAMNRC code accurately models the Primus LINAC head.
- The validated MC model provides reliable estimations of EFD, PDD, and beam profiles.
- This approach enhances the accuracy of dose calculations in radiation therapy planning.
More Related Videos
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
14:11Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis
Published on: March 29, 2016