Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.3K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.3K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.4K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

4.6K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
4.6K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

119
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
119
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

353
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
353
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

5.3K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
5.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-Reported Penicillin Allergy, Alternative Antibiotics, and Implant Outcomes: A Retrospective Study.

Clinical implant dentistry and related research·2026
Same author

Lithium's effects on serum neurofilament light in Parkinson's disease: A post hoc analysis.

IBRO neuroscience reports·2026
Same author

Statistical models for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: Lessons learned from the DIAN-TU Platform Trial.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

Penalized estimation of linear transformation models for interval-censored data with time-dependent covariates.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Likelihood ratio test for the disease progression model to measure saved time in Alzheimer's disease.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Adaptive sample size re-estimation designs for a two-stage randomized trial with binary outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

1.3K

Exact Unconditional Tests for Dichotomous Data When Comparing Multiple Treatments With a Single Control.

Guogen Shan1, Carolee Dodge-Francis2, Gregory E Wilding3

  • 1School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89154, USA. guogen.shan@unlv.edu.

Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
|February 20, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study compares two exact unconditional approaches for clinical trial analysis with binary outcomes. The estimation and maximization approach may enhance effectiveness in selecting treatments for further investigation.

Keywords:
Dunnett’s testdichotomous dataexact testmultiple comparisonunconditional test

More Related Videos

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.1K
Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation
07:12

Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation

Published on: August 26, 2016

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

1.3K
Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.1K
Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation
07:12

Protocol for Data Collection and Analysis Applied to Automated Facial Expression Analysis Technology and Temporal Analysis for Sensory Evaluation

Published on: August 26, 2016

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmacological Research

Background:

  • Clinical trials frequently assess multiple treatments or doses against a control.
  • Binary outcomes are common, necessitating robust hypothesis testing methods.
  • Dunnett's test and other procedures exist for comparing treatments to a control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare two exact unconditional approaches for analyzing clinical trials with binary outcomes.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed estimation and maximization approach.
  • To provide recommendations for selecting appropriate statistical methods in clinical trial design.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of two exact unconditional approaches: maximization-based and estimation-maximization-based.
  • Utilized 3 commonly used test statistics.
  • Evaluated performance across various clinical trial design settings via numerical studies.

Main Results:

  • The estimation and maximization approach demonstrated potential for increased effectiveness.
  • Performance differences were observed based on the chosen test statistic and design settings.
  • Numerical studies provided insights into the behavior of both approaches.

Conclusions:

  • The estimation and maximization exact unconditional approach may offer advantages in certain clinical trial scenarios.
  • Recommendations are provided for the practical application of these statistical methods.
  • Illustrative application using a real-world psoriasis clinical trial.