Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correlations02:20

Correlations

35.7K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
35.7K
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

7.6K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
7.6K
Correlation and Regression00:53

Correlation and Regression

2.9K
In statistics, correlation describes the degree of association between two variables. In the subfield of linear regression, correlation is mathematically expressed by the correlation coefficient, which describes the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. The coefficient is symbolically represented by 'r' and ranges from -1 to +1. A positive value indicates a positive correlation where the two variables move in the same direction. A negative value suggests a...
2.9K
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

442
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
442
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.3K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.3K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

8.0K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
8.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factor-Analytic Evidence for the Complexity of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS).

Assessment·2019
Same author

Brain-computer interface use is a skill that user and system acquire together.

PLoS biology·2018
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
07:11

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis

Published on: November 10, 2023

3.1K

The Effects of Using Partial or Uncorrected Correlation Matrices When Comparing Network and Latent Variable Models.

Dennis McFarland1

  • 1National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Albany, NY 12208, USA.

Journal of Intelligence
|February 21, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Network and latent variable models for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) were compared. Network models best fit partial correlations, while latent variable models best fit full correlations, suggesting full correlations are better for WAIS-IV modeling.

Keywords:
intelligencelatent variable modelingprocess overlap theorypsychometric network analysis

More Related Videos

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.0K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
07:11

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis

Published on: November 10, 2023

3.1K
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.0K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Intelligence Testing

Background:

  • Network models using partial correlations have shown promise for analyzing cognitive abilities.
  • Latent variable models traditionally use uncorrected correlation matrices.
  • The WAIS-IV is a widely used measure of adult intelligence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly compare network and latent variable models for the WAIS-IV.
  • To evaluate model fit using both partial and uncorrected correlation matrices.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed network models and latent variable models for WAIS-IV data.
  • Utilized both regularized partial correlation matrices and uncorrected correlation matrices.
  • Assessed model fit using established psychometric criteria.

Main Results:

  • Network models demonstrated superior fit when using partial correlation matrices.
  • Latent variable models showed better fit with uncorrected (full) correlation matrices.
  • Partial correlations substantially reduce shared variance among WAIS-IV subtests.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of correlation matrix (partial vs. full) critically impacts model selection for the WAIS-IV.
  • Latent variable models are more appropriate for uncorrected correlation matrices, capturing broader shared variance.
  • Uncorrected correlations are recommended for WAIS-IV modeling to represent overall cognitive structure.