Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

35.9K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
35.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mixed evidence for the rhythmicity of auditory perceptual judgements in humans.

eLife·2025
Same author

Evidence That Respiratory Phase May Modulate Task-Related Neural Representations of Visual Stimuli.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Respiration shapes response speed and accuracy with a systematic time lag.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Perceived Multisensory Common Cause Relations Shape the Ventriloquism Effect but Only Marginally the Trial-Wise Aftereffect.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025
Same author

Variance (un)explained: Experimental conditions and temporal dependencies explain similarly small proportions of reaction time variability in linear models of perceptual and cognitive tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024
Same author

Multisensory perception depends on the reliability of the type of judgment.

Journal of neurophysiology·2024
Same journal

Translational profiling of Drd2-expressing populations reveals molecular heterogeneity of dentate gyrus mossy cells along the dorsoventral axis.

eNeuro·2026
Same journal

Movement Disorder Patients with Depression have Altered Corticostriatal Alpha-Beta Power Response to Reward and Loss.

eNeuro·2026
Same journal

Ocular speech tracking persists in blindness, but its dynamics and oculo-cerebral connectivity depend on visual status.

eNeuro·2026
Same journal

Emergent multidien cycles from partial circadian synchrony.

eNeuro·2026
Same journal

Adolescent social isolation induces persistent impairments in emotional discrimination and helping behavior.

eNeuro·2026
Same journal

Increased Ih Current Is Associated with Reduced Hippocampal CA1 Excitability in a Mouse Model of Multiple Sclerosis.

eNeuro·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.3K

Shared Physiological Correlates of Multisensory and Expectation-Based Facilitation.

Stephanie J Kayser1,2, Christoph Kayser3,4

  • 1Department for Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld 33615, Germany.

Eneuro
|February 21, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Both multisensory cues and symbolic cues improve visual perception by enhancing neural encoding. This suggests overlapping brain mechanisms process both types of information, indicating a flexible neural system for expectation.

Keywords:
EEGcueingexpectationmultisensoryvisual perception

More Related Videos

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

16.9K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 28, 2025

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.3K
Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

16.9K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human Perception
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Perceptual performance can be enhanced by multisensory information or by symbolic cues that create expectations.
  • It remains unclear whether these distinct cueing methods rely on shared or separate neurophysiological processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the benefits of multisensory versus symbolic cues on visual perception.
  • To compare the influence of acoustic motion, premotion visual symbolic cue, and postmotion symbolic cue on visual motion discrimination.

Main Methods:

  • Human participants performed a visual motion discrimination task.
  • Electroencephalography (EEG) data were recorded and analyzed using multivariate techniques.
  • The influence of three types of auxiliary probabilistic cues (acoustic motion, premotion visual symbolic, postmotion symbolic) was assessed.

Main Results:

  • Both multisensory (acoustic motion) and preceding visual symbolic cues enhanced the encoding of visual motion direction.
  • This enhancement was reflected in occipital EEG activity between 200-400 ms post-stimulus onset.
  • Prestimulus alpha power differentially modulated the integration of acoustic cues but not visual symbolic cues.

Conclusions:

  • A common or overlapping neural mechanism supports the processing of both cross-modal and intramodal auxiliary information.
  • The brain exhibits a neural mechanism sensitive to both multisensory and abstract probabilistic cues.
  • Prestimulus activity plays a differential role in integrating multisensory versus abstract symbolic cues.