Hemodynamic events during carotid stenting are associated with significant periprocedural stroke and adverse events
Isibor J Arhuidese1, Mary E Ottinger1, Ankur J Shukla1
1Division of Vascular Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla.
Insights
Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) can lead to periprocedural stroke, especially with hypertension, hypotension, or bradycardia. Promptly addressing these hemodynamic events and using antibradyarrhythmic agents can reduce stroke risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Neurology
Background:
- Limited data exist on the impact of hemodynamic changes during carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) on periprocedural stroke.
- This study investigates the risk of stroke associated with CAS-related hemodynamic events and the protective role of preprocedural medications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of periprocedural hypertension, hypotension, and bradycardia on stroke risk following CAS.
- To assess the effectiveness of preprocedural medications in mitigating stroke risk during CAS.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a large, population-based cohort from the Vascular Quality Initiative (2006-2016).
- Utilized Kaplan-Meier, multivariable logistic, and Cox regression analyses to assess outcomes.
- Evaluated the association between hemodynamic events (hypertension, hypotension, bradycardia) and stroke (immediate, 30-day, 1-year).
Main Results:
- Periprocedural hypertension, hypotension, and bradycardia were frequent, occurring in 9.1%, 13.3%, and 9.7% of CAS procedures, respectively.
- Hypertension significantly increased immediate periprocedural stroke (IPPS) risk (aOR 3.97), while hypotension and bradycardia also elevated IPPS in symptomatic patients (aORs 5.56 and 2.31).
- Prophylactic antibradyarrhythmic agents reduced IPPS by 58% in symptomatic patients, and hemodynamic events were linked to increased myocardial infarction, mortality, and length of stay.
Conclusions:
- Periprocedural hemodynamic events during CAS are associated with increased risks of stroke, myocardial infarction, mortality, and longer hospital stays.
- Hypertension, hypotension, and bradycardia significantly elevate stroke risk, particularly in patients with symptomatic carotid disease.
- Anticipating and managing these hemodynamic events, including the use of prophylactic antibradyarrhythmic agents, is crucial for improving patient outcomes after CAS.
Background:
There are limited data on the impact of carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS)-related changes in blood pressure, heart rate, and preprocedural medications on periprocedural stroke in contemporary, real-world practice. This study evaluates the risk attributable to the CAS-related hemodynamic events and the impact preprocedural medications have on mitigating this risk in a large, population-based cohort.
Methods:
We studied all patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative who underwent CAS between January 2006 and December 2016. Kaplan-Meier, multivariable logistic, and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the impact of periprocedural hypertension, hypotension, bradycardia, and medication use on immediate periprocedural stroke (IPPS), 30-day, and 1-year stroke.
Results:
Of the 13,698 CAS procedures studied, 1239 (9.1%), 1824 (13.3%), and 1333 (9.7%) patients experienced periprocedural hypertension, hypotension, and bradycardia, respectively. IPPS was 3.2% vs 2.1% vs 0.65% (P < .001), comparing patients with periprocedural hypertension vs hypotension vs normotension and 1.4 vs 1.0% (P = .19) for bradycardic vs nonbradycardic patients. Periprocedural hypertension was associated with a four-fold increase in IPPS (adjusted odd ratio [aOR], 3.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.63-5.99; P < .001). periprocedural hypotension and bradycardia were associated with 5.5-fold (aOR, 5.56; 95% CI, 3.24-9.52; P < .001) and 2.3-fold (aOR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.26-4.25; P = .007) increases in IPPS among patients with carotid symptoms. There was 76% decrease in IPPS for patients who did not experience a periprocedural hemodynamic event (aOR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.16-0.35; P < .001). Unlike preprocedural beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, prophylactic antibradyarrhythmic agents conferred a 58% reduction in IPPS among patients with carotid symptoms (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.78; P = .006). The periprocedural hemodynamic events were also associated with 7.7-fold increase in myocardial infarction (aOR, 7.70; 95% CI, 4.77-12.45; P < .001), a 2.2-fold increase in 30-day mortality (aOR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.61-3.12; P < .001), and a 16% increase in length of stay (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.04-2.28; P = .042). The occurrence of these hemodynamic events is higher in patients with prior cardiac disease and the difference in periprocedural outcomes extended to 1 year.
Conclusions:
Periprocedural hemodynamic events are associated with an increase in periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, death, and length of stay. Periprocedural hypertension in all patients; hypotension and bradycardia in patients with symptomatic carotid disease are associated with significant increase in IPPS. Prophylactic antibradyarrhythmic agents are associated with decrease in bradycardia and IPPS. These results heighten the need to anticipate and promptly address these CAS-related hemodynamic events, especially in susceptible patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Arteries of the Head and Neck
The internal carotid arteries supply blood to the anterior portion of the cerebrum. They enter the...


