Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Understanding the dynamic interinfluences of implementation processes: An illustration by multiple case studies.
Mélissa Goulet1, Isabelle Archambault2, Michel Janosz2
1University of Quebec in Montreal, Department of Specialized Education and Formation, Canada; School Environments Research Group, Canada.
Understanding how school leadership and funding impact dropout prevention programs like Check & Connect (C&C) is crucial. This study reveals the dynamic interplay of these factors in successful program implementation.
Area of Science:
- Education Policy
- School Psychology
- Program Implementation Science
Background:
- Numerous dropout prevention programs exist, yet contextual implementation factors remain understudied.
- School principal leadership and governmental funding are known influences, but their dynamic interplay is unclear.
- Check & Connect (C&C) is a validated, targeted dropout prevention program focusing on student-mentor relationships.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the implementation processes of the Check & Connect (C&C) program.
- To understand the contextual factors influencing C&C implementation.
- To explore the dynamic interplay of implementation processes and their association with program outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 mentors and coordinators involved in C&C implementation.
- Utilized thematic analysis to identify key implementation processes.
- Employed synthetic case studies and the Planned Change Framework to analyze implementation dynamics.
Main Results:
- Identified distinct implementation processes and 'implementation stories' across different sites.
- The Planned Change Framework illuminated complex dynamics influencing C&C implementation.
- Implementation dynamics were associated with program outcomes, extending beyond mere fidelity.
Conclusions:
- Contextual factors and their dynamic interplay significantly influence the implementation of evidence-based dropout prevention programs.
- Understanding these dynamics is essential for successful program adoption and effectiveness in schools.
- Findings offer implications for optimizing future implementations of educational interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Impact of Individuals on a Group
Case Studies
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Impression Management Techniques I: Managing Appearances

