Analysis of a Near Peer Tutoring Program to Improve Medical Students' Note Writing Skills

Problem: The ability to document a patient encounter is integral for any physician. Previous studies indicate that medical students' note writing skills are poor due to a lack of formal clinical documentation instruction. Barriers to formally teaching students how to write patient notes include the significant time burden and variability in faculty feedback. Implementing a near-peer teaching program to teach students how to write a patient note can overcome these barriers and fill this curricular gap. Intervention: Fourth year medical students who completed a Teaching in Medicine elective course were trained to provide individual feedback to 1^st and 2^nd year students on note writing as a part of their Introduction to Clinical Medicine course. In order to determine the effect of this two year, near-peer feedback program on note writing skills, we analyzed students' scores on the note writing portion of two Objective Structured Clinical Exams that took place at the end of the 2^nd and 3^rd years of medical school. Context: The near-peer feedback sessions were implemented in the Fall of 2013 during the preclinical years of the medical school curriculum. Data from students who received near-peer feedback (N = 112) were compared to a historical control group who did not receive near-peer feedback on their note writing (N = 110). Objective Structured Clinical Exam scores that were specific to note writing skills, including the history, physical exam, and differential diagnosis subscales were examined. Impact: The near-peer feedback had a positive impact on the quality of patient notes. On the end of the 2^nd year Objective Structured Clinical Exam, the near-peer feedback intervention group outperformed the no feedback group on the history and physical exam subscale scores but not on the differential diagnosis subscale score. One year later, the near-peer feedback intervention group continued to outperform the no feedback group on the physical exam subscale score, but not the history or the differential diagnosis subscale scores. Lessons Learned: Near-peer teaching improves student documentation of the history and physical exam, however only the effects on the physical exam portion persist into the clinical years of training. Writing up a differential diagnosis is a skill that develops through the clerkship experience regardless of exposure to feedback in the preclinical years. Implementing near-peer teaching in the medical school setting is feasible and can provide students with valuable learning experiences without relying on clinical faculty.