Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.0K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.5K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.5K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

64.0K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
64.0K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

255.0K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
255.0K
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.6K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.6K
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

3.7K
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
3.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Education and practice recommendations for developing pharmacists as researchers in the United Kingdom, informed by self-determination theory.

The International journal of pharmacy practice·2026
Same author

Medical students' experiences in providing medical care to older patients: A rich picture study.

Medical education·2026
Same author

Patients' and Partners' Perceptions of Care and Education Within an Interprofessional Training Unit on a Dutch Maternity Ward.

Teaching and learning in medicine·2026
Same author

Junior doctors' experiences with vulnerability: A rich picture study.

Medical education·2026
Same author

Learning and identity development during interprofessional hospital placements: A qualitative exploration using rich pictures.

Medical teacher·2025
Same author

How do pharmacists navigate clinical uncertainty when reviewing polypharmacy? A critical literature review.

BMC primary care·2025
Same journal

Is It My Responsibility? Professional Organizations' Perspectives on Disability Inclusion in Health Professions Education and Practice.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Integrated Team-Based Learning in a UK Undergraduate Medical Programme.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Women's Conferences in Medicine: Advancing Gender Equity in Medical Education.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Entrusting Attention: An Additional lens on Entrustable Professional Activity Assessment.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Students as Teachers (SAT) and Educators: An Online Elective in Medical Education.

The clinical teacher·2026
Same journal

Beyond Student Proactivity in Surgical Placements.

The clinical teacher·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.1K

How to … do mixed-methods research.

Anu Kajamaa1, Karen Mattick2, Anne de la Croix3,4

  • 1Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

The Clinical Teacher
|February 25, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article explains mixed-methods research, combining qualitative and quantitative data for deeper insights. It supports clinical teachers and researchers by detailing designs, opportunities, and challenges in this complex research approach.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.4K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.1K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.4K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education Research
  • Clinical Teaching
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Clinicians and educators integrate diverse data (patient narratives, learner performance) for informed decisions.
  • Mixed-methods research mirrors this by combining qualitative and quantitative data for richer insights.
  • This approach offers significant value to clinical teaching but presents design complexities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate various mixed-methods research designs.
  • To outline the opportunities and challenges associated with mixed-methods research in clinical settings.
  • To provide guidance for novice researchers conducting their first mixed-methods study.

Main Methods:

  • Review of mixed-methods research designs relevant to clinical education.
  • Discussion of the integration of qualitative and quantitative data.
  • Analysis of practical applications, benefits, and potential difficulties.

Main Results:

  • Mixed-methods research offers complementary insights beyond single-method approaches.
  • Understanding different designs is crucial for effective implementation.
  • Successful application requires careful consideration of potential challenges.

Conclusions:

  • Mixed-methods research is a valuable, albeit complex, tool for clinical teachers and researchers.
  • Familiarity with diverse designs enhances the utility of this research approach.
  • Support and clear guidance are essential for researchers new to mixed-methods studies.