Influence of a Functional Nutrients-Enriched Infant Formula on Language Development in Healthy Children at Four Years

Ana Nieto-Ruiz1,2,3,4, Estefanía Diéguez1,2,3, Natalia Sepúlveda-Valbuena2,5

  • 1Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Avda. Investigación 11, 18016 Granada, Spain.

Nutrients
|February 26, 2020
PubMed

Insights

A new infant formula enriched with bioactive compounds showed positive long-term effects on children's language development. This enhanced formula, compared to standard formula, supported language skills similarly to breastfed infants by age four.

Area of Science:

  • Child Development
  • Nutritional Science
  • Pediatric Neurology

Background:

  • Early life nutrition is critical for brain development and establishing cognitive and language skills.
  • Breastfeeding is traditionally linked to better neurodevelopmental outcomes compared to formula feeding.
  • The long-term impact of specialized infant formulas on language development requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the long-term effects of a novel infant formula enriched with bioactive compounds on language development in four-year-old children.
  • To compare the language outcomes of children fed standard formula, enriched formula, or breast milk.
  • To assess the influence of infant nutrition on specific aspects of language skills, including expression and overall development.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized double-blind COGNIS study involving 122 children followed up at age four.
  • Participants were fed either standard formula (SF), enriched formula (EF), or were exclusively breastfed (BF) for the first 18 months.
  • Language development was assessed using the Oral Language Task of Navarra-Revised (PLON-R), with statistical analyses including ANCOVA and logistic regression.

Main Results:

  • Children fed the enriched formula (EF) showed higher scores in language use and spontaneous oral expression compared to those fed standard formula (SF).
  • Both SF and EF groups performed similarly to the breastfed (BF) group in overall language development.
  • SF-fed children were more likely to exhibit delayed language development compared to EF-fed and BF children, with a trend linking lower socioeconomic status to poorer language skills.

Conclusions:

  • The enriched infant formula (EF) appears to support long-term language development in children up to four years of age.
  • The EF group demonstrated language outcomes comparable to breastfed infants, suggesting a potential benefit over standard formula.
  • Infant nutrition plays a significant role in language acquisition, and specialized formulas may offer advantages for children not exclusively breastfed.

Related Concept Videos

Language Development01:22

Language Development

Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
744
Environmental Influences on Intelligence01:29

Environmental Influences on Intelligence

Despite the strong genetic influence on traits like intelligence, environmental factors significantly shape outcomes. For example, while over 90% of height variation is due to genetic differences, environmental factors such as nutrition also have a notable impact. Similarly, for intelligence, changes in a child's surroundings can significantly alter their IQ. Research shows that enriched environments boost children's academic success and help them develop key cognitive skills. Children...
794
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
643
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption01:23

Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption

Understanding the physiological differences in the pediatric population is crucial for effective pharmacotherapy. Neonates, infants, and children exhibit significant variations in gastric pH, gastric emptying time, intestinal transit time, and biliary function. These variations profoundly affect oral drug absorption, necessitating a nuanced approach to pediatric dosing.Neonates present with a unique physiological profile, having a gastric pH greater than 4 and faster and more irregular gastric...
184
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
3.1K
Biological Influences on Intelligence01:30

Biological Influences on Intelligence

Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter...
423