Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biomaterials for facial bone augmentation: comparative studies.

J Wilson1, G E Merwin

  • 1J. Hillis Miller Health Center, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610.

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
|August 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Treatment of hypertension induces a fall in platelet basal cytoplasmic calcium concentration without influencing platelet aggregation.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·1992
Same author

Isolation of transglutaminase-reactive sequences from complex biological systems: a prominent lysine donor sequence in bovine lens.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1992
Same author

Expression and gene transcript of Fc receptors for IgG, HLA class II antigens and Langerhans cells in human cervico-vaginal epithelium.

Clinical and experimental immunology·1992
Same author

Progressive bulbar paralysis of childhood. A reappraisal of Fazio-Londe disease.

Brain : a journal of neurology·1992
Same author

Induction of rat hepatic mixed-function oxidases by acetone and other physiological ketones: their role in diabetes-induced changes in cytochrome P450 proteins.

Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems·1992
Same author

Selective inhibition of human immunodeficiency viruses by racemates and enantiomers of cis-5-fluoro-1-[2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-oxathiolan-5-yl]cytosine.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·1992
Same journal

Optimizing the tensile properties of polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel for the construction of a bioprosthetic heart valve stent.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
Same journal

Wear of conventional and cross-linked ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular cups against polished and roughened CoCr femoral heads in a biaxial hip simulator.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
Same journal

Immobilization of natural macromolecules on poly-L-lactic acid membrane surface in order to improve its cytocompatibility.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
Same journal

Light scattering and in vitro biocompatibility studies of poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) derivatives with amino-acid-dependent groups.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
Same journal

Immobilization of an oxalate-degrading enzyme on silicone elastomer.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
Same journal

An evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of orthodontic bonding adhesives upon a primary human oral gingival fibroblast culture and a permanent, human oral cancer-cell line.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2002
See all related articles

Bioglass implants offer superior facial bone augmentation compared to traditional materials. Their surface activity ensures better long-term immobilization, unlike porous or woven options that cause adverse cellular responses.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Current materials for facial bone augmentation, including polymers and homograft bone, have limitations.
  • Existing implants often rely on tissue ingrowth, which can compromise long-term success.
  • Autograft bone presents challenges with morbidity and unpredictable incorporation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate Bioglass as a potential material for facial bone augmentation.
  • To compare the performance of Bioglass with existing clinical materials.
  • To assess the immobilization efficacy and tissue response to Bioglass implants.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of various polymer-based implants (solid, porous, woven) and homograft bone in a clinical model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of Bioglass implants in the same model for comparative analysis.
  • Assessment of implant immobilization at hard and soft tissue interfaces.

    • Main Results:

    • Bioglass implants demonstrated superior short-term and long-term immobilization due to surface activity, outperforming tissue ingrowth-dependent materials.
    • Porous and woven materials induced persistent cellular responses, potentially compromising clinical outcomes.
    • Bioglass achieved successful immobilization without porosity, offered intraoperative shaping, and possessed bone-like hardness.

    Conclusions:

    • Bioglass presents a promising alternative for facial bone augmentation, offering enhanced immobilization and biocompatibility.
    • Unlike other materials, Bioglass does not require porosity for effective integration and provides desirable mechanical properties.
    • The surface activity and bone-like hardness of Bioglass suggest improved long-term clinical success in facial reconstruction.