Closed vs open reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip: The short-term effect on acetabular remodeling

Oussama Abousamra1, David Deliberato2, Satbir Singh1

  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.

Insights

Open reduction with capsulorrhaphy may improve acetabular remodeling in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) compared to closed reduction in young children. Higher remodeling is expected with open reduction, though avascular necrosis (AVN) remains a risk.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)
  • Surgical Techniques

Background:

  • Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) is a common pediatric condition.
  • Early intervention is crucial for optimal outcomes.
  • Acetabular remodeling is a key factor in long-term hip health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare acetabular remodeling after closed versus open hip reduction in children under two years old with DDH.
  • To evaluate the incidence of residual dysplasia and avascular necrosis (AVN) based on the reduction method.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of children with DDH who underwent closed or open reduction.
  • Acetabular index (AI) measured pre-reduction and at age 4.
  • Analysis of radiographic outcomes, including residual dysplasia (AI ≥ 30°) and AVN.

Main Results:

  • 42 hips had closed reduction; 26 had open reduction.
  • Higher rates of residual dysplasia (outcome AI ≥ 30°) were observed in the successful closed reduction group (29% vs. 19%).
  • Avascular necrosis (AVN) incidence was higher in the open reduction group (13% vs. 7%).

Conclusions:

  • Open reduction with capsulorrhaphy may offer superior acetabular remodeling compared to closed reduction in DDH patients under two, even with maintained reduction.
  • While AVN is a consideration, open reduction may lead to better long-term acetabular development.
Abstract