Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Hepatitis B Virus Detection
Published on: December 15, 2023
Comparative study on guidelines in determining HBV phases in Iranian patients
Sara Ashtari1, Afsaneh Sharifian2, Behzad Hatami2
1Basic and Molecular Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Insights
Different alanine aminotransferase (ALT) cutoff values significantly impact the classification of chronic Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection phases. Lower ALT thresholds may reclassify patients, increasing eligibility for treatment.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Virology
- Clinical Biochemistry
Background:
- The normal upper limit for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been debated, with some guidelines lowering the previously accepted 40 IU/L threshold.
- This evolving understanding necessitates re-evaluation of patient classification based on ALT levels.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the classification of chronic Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection phases using different alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normal value cutoffs.
- To assess the impact of varying ALT thresholds on patient categorization and potential treatment eligibility.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study of 2000 HBsAg-positive patients was conducted between 2011 and 2018.
- Patients were classified into different phases of chronic HBV infection based on three guideline sets: AASLD, EASL/APASL, and ACG, which use distinct ALT cutoffs.
- The frequency distribution across these classifications was compared.
Main Results:
- In HBeAg-positive patients, the immune tolerance phase varied from 28% (ACG) to 68% (EASL/APASL) using different ALT cutoffs.
- For HBeAg-negative patients, the inactive carrier state ranged from 52.42% (ACG) to 82.89% (EASL/APASL).
- Lower ALT cutoffs (ACG and AASLD) resulted in a higher proportion of patients shifting from immune tolerance or inactive carrier states to the immune active phase.
Conclusions:
- The choice of ALT cutoff significantly influences the classification of chronic HBV infection phases.
- Lower ALT thresholds, particularly those from ACG and AASLD, may lead to more patients being classified as active HBV cases.
- This reclassification impacts treatment decisions, potentially increasing the number of patients eligible for antiviral therapy or requiring further investigation for liver damage.
Aim:
The aim of this study was to compare the different phases of chronic Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with different values for normal ALT.
Background:
For many years, the upper limit of 40 IU was considered normal for ALT for both sexes, but in recent years this value is challenged and some guidelines have lowered their limit.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study, 2000 HBsAg positive patients who were referred to Taleghani Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from 2011 through 2018 were classified in four groups according to American Association of the study of the liver disease (AASLD), European Association of the study of the liver (EASL) /Asian-Pacific Association of the study of the liver (APASL) and American Collage of Gastroenterology (ACG) guidelines. The frequency of each group based on 3 different guidelines was compared.
Results:
In HBeAg positive patients (n=100), the percentage of immune tolerance phase was 43% according to AASLD cutoff for normal ALT (35 IU for men, 25 IU for women), while it was 68% and 28% with regard to EASL/APASL and ACG (30 IU for men, 19 IU for women) cutoffs respectively. In HBeAg negative patients (n=1900), 66.68% were inactive carriers according to AASLD, but the percentage changed to 82.89% and 52.42% considering EASL/APASL and ACG values, respectively.
Conclusion:
Using ACG and to a lesser extent AASLD cutoff for ALT, many patients shift from immune tolerance and inactive carrier state into the immune active phase. Thus, more patients are candidates for treatment or intensive workup to determine the extent of liver damage.
More Related Videos
10:37Analysis of HBV-Specific CD4 T-cell Responses and Identification of HLA-DR-Restricted CD4 T-Cell Epitopes Based on a Peptide Matrix
Published on: October 20, 2021
11:28Dried Blood Spots - Preparing and Processing for Use in Immunoassays and in Molecular Techniques
Published on: March 13, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow