Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.8K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

119
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
119

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Co-Benefits of Nutrition Interventions: A Systematic Review.

Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity·2026
Same author

Valuing Australian parent preferences for community-based nutrition and physical activity initiatives: a discrete choice experiment.

Health promotion international·2026
Same author

Guideline Adherence of Perioperative Antibiotics and Surgical Site Infections in Noncardiac Surgery.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Autistic Adults and Loved Ones' Experiences of a Later Life Diagnosis.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2026
Same author

Proposed domains of postpartum sleep: a concept elicitation study using qualitative interviews.

Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society·2025
Same author

Care interrupted: a mixed-methods study of lapse in primary care and cardiology services for women with CHD.

Cardiology in the young·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

4.0K

Randomized Controlled Simulation Trial to Compare Transfer Procedures for Emergency Cesarean.

Jill Mhyre, Nicole Ward, Teresa M Whited

    Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing : JOGNN
    |February 27, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary

    Capping intravenous and epidural lines did not significantly decrease time to anesthesia readiness for emergency cesarean. However, the "cap and run" method improved operating room transfer time and perceived patient safety.

    Keywords:
    anesthesiaanesthesiologycesareandeliveryemergenciesnursingobstetricobstetric nursingpatient care teampatient simulationpregnant

    More Related Videos

    Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
    06:48

    Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

    Published on: May 20, 2018

    10.0K
    Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
    09:52

    Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

    Published on: January 15, 2017

    17.6K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

    Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
    08:08

    Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

    Published on: May 6, 2020

    4.0K
    Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
    06:48

    Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

    Published on: May 20, 2018

    10.0K
    Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
    09:52

    Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

    Published on: January 15, 2017

    17.6K

    Area of Science:

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • Patient Safety
    • Anesthesiology

    Background:

    • Emergency cesarean delivery requires rapid team response.
    • Optimizing patient transfer and anesthesia preparation is critical for maternal outcomes.
    • Current transfer protocols may present challenges to efficient team mobilization.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate if capping intravenous (IV) and epidural lines reduces transfer time to the operating room (OR).
    • To assess the impact of line capping on time to readiness for general anesthesia during emergency cesarean.
    • To identify potential patient safety threats within the emergency cesarean workflow.

    Main Methods:

    • A randomized, controlled, in-situ simulation trial was conducted on the labor and delivery unit.
    • Fifteen interprofessional teams (nurses, anesthesiology residents) participated.
    • Teams were randomized to either usual transfer or the "cap and run" procedure before simulation scenarios.

    Main Results:

    • No statistically significant difference in time from decision to cesarean to anesthesia readiness between groups (p=.12).
    • The "cap and run" group showed a statistically significant reduction in time spent in the operating room (p=.038).
    • Qualitative analysis revealed benefits of "cap and run," including improved bed maneuverability and fewer tangled lines.

    Conclusions:

    • Capping IV and epidural lines did not decrease overall time to anesthesia readiness for emergency cesarean.
    • The "cap and run" procedure demonstrated potential benefits in OR transfer efficiency and perceived patient safety by nursing staff.