Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
[Multicenter comparison of complications after robot-assisted and open simple prostatectomy]
C Hamann1, C-M Naumann2, M Addali3
1Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland. Claudius.Hamann@uksh.de.
Introduction:
Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) is a relatively new minimally invasive procedure for surgical treatment to manage symptomatic, therapy-refractory benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) in prostate volumes >80 cm3. Thus, postoperative morbidity based on Clavien-Dindo and hematological parameters in RASP and open simple prostatectomy (OSP) procedures are examined.
Patients And Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed a total of 78 patients: 39 patients underwent RAPS and 39 OSP. The following parameters were statistically evaluated and compared: age, PSA value, prostate volume, ASA score, duration of hospital stay, operative time, Hb decrease on postoperative (po) day 1 and in the 5 five po days, CRP peak in the first 5 po days and transfusion rate.
Results:
The comparison between RASP and standard OSP showed no significant differences regarding the mean patient age (73 vs. 74 years; p =0.54), PSA values (7.7 vs. 10.7 ng/ml; p =0.17), ASA score (2.2 vs. 2.3; p =0.26) and prostate volume (130 vs. 113 cm3; p =0.07). Patients in the RAPAE group had statistically significant longer surgery (178 vs. 110 min; p =<0.01) with a significantly smaller decrease in Hb on po day 1 (1.9 vs. 3.3 g/dl; p ≤0.01) and in the first 5 po days (2.4 vs. 4.2 g/dl; p ≤0.01), lower need for preserved blood (3% vs. 26%; p =0.01) and number of blood bags (0.1 vs. 1.3; p =0.01), a lower po Clavien-Dindo score (0.44 vs. 1.23; p =0.003) and lower CRP values (52 vs. 104 mg/l; p ≤0.01) in the first 5 po days.
Conclusion:
RASP is a safe procedure that offers the advantage of reduced blood loss and blood bag consumption and rare complications due to the minimally invasive surgical method. The OSP group showed an increased occurrence of complications due to bleeding, leading to prolonged hospitalization and significantly increased need for blood transfusion. The lesser increase of CRP in RASP group is a result of the lower invasiveness of the robot-assisted procedure.
More Related Videos
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
12:34Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction
Published on: January 3, 2020