Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
Prognostic implication of global myocardial blood flow in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Rikuta Hamaya1,2, Yoshihisa Kanaji1, Masahiro Hada1
1Department of Cardiology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, 4-4-1 Otsuno, Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, 300-0028, Japan.
Insights
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)-derived hyperemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) offers significant prognostic value in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. This advanced marker improves risk prediction for major adverse cardiac events beyond traditional imaging techniques.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Prognostic implications of hyperemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients remain unclear.
- Conventional CMR markers like left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and microvascular obstruction (MVO) are established prognostic indicators post-STEMI.
- Identifying high-risk patients after STEMI is crucial for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the incremental prognostic value of CMR-derived hyperemic MBF compared to conventional CMR markers in STEMI patients.
- To identify patients at high risk for future patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCO) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after STEMI.
- To determine if hyperemic MBF adds predictive power to existing risk stratification models.
Main Methods:
- Prospective enrollment of 237 STEMI patients.
- CMR protocol included LVEF, LGE, MVO, and volumetric hyperemic MBF assessment.
- Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were used to assess prognostic value and outcomes over a median 2.6-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- Multivessel disease, LGE, MVO, and hyperemic MBF were independently associated with POCO.
- Addition of hyperemic MBF significantly improved the predictive efficacy of a model including GRACE score, multivessel disease, LVEF, LGE, and MVO (IDI = 0.020, p = 0.021).
- Patients with low hyperemic MBF exhibited a significantly higher incidence of MACE compared to those with high hyperemic MBF (p = 0.018).
Conclusions:
- CMR-derived hyperemic MBF provides independent and incremental prognostic value in STEMI patients.
- Hyperemic MBF assessment enhances risk stratification beyond traditional CMR parameters like LVEF, LGE, and MVO.
- This finding supports the integration of hyperemic MBF into routine CMR protocols for improved post-STEMI risk assessment.
Abstract:
The prognostic implications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)-derived hyperemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are unknown. This study sought to investigate the incremental prognostic value of hyperemic MBF over conventional CMR markers to identify patients with high risk of future incidence of patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCO) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after STEMI. A total of 237 patients who presented with STEMI were prospectively enrolled. The CMR protocol included left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and microvascular obstruction (MVO) measurement, and volumetric MBF assessment. During a median follow-up of 2.6 years, 47 patients experienced POCO (primary outcome) and 21 patients had MACE. In a multivariable model, multivessel disease, LGE, MVO, and hyperemic MBF were independently associated with POCO. Addition of hyperemic MBF to the model consisting of GRACE score, multivessel disease, LVEF, LGE, and MVO significantly improved the predictive efficacy (integrated discrimination improvement 0.020, p = 0.021). Patients with low hyperemic MBF had significantly higher incidence of MACE compared to those with high hyperemic MBF in propensity score matching analysis (p = 0.018). In conclusion, CMR-derived hyperemic MBF could provide independent and incremental prognostic value over LVEF, LGE, and MVO in patients with STEMI.
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

