Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Intracardiac Fibrinolysis and Endothelium Activation Related to Atrial Fibrillation Ablation with Different
Orsolya Hajas1, Zsuzsa Bagoly2,3, Noémi K Tóth2
1Institute of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Objective:
The effect of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on fibrinolytic and endothelial activation with currently applied periprocedural anticoagulation has not been explored. We measured markers of fibrinolysis and endothelium activation before and after PVI with the second-generation cryoballoon (Cryo), pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC-Gold), and irrigated radiofrequency (IRF).
Methods:
Markers of fibrinolysis and endothelium activation in left atrial (LA) blood samples were measured in 31 patients before and after PVI (Cryo:10, PVAC-Gold: 7, IRF: 14). Periprocedural anticoagulation included uninterrupted vitamin K antagonist and iv heparin (ACT≥300 sec) during LA dwelling.
Results:
Levels of D-dimer (median; interquartile range, mgFEU/L) increased with all techniques (PVAC: 0.34; 0.24-0.50 versus 0.70; 0.61-1.31; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; PAP complex level (ng/ml) increased after Cryo (247.3, 199.9-331.6 versus 270.9, 227.9-346.7; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; PAI-1 activity (%) decreased with the PVAC (1.931; 0.508-3.859 versus 0.735, 0.240-2.707; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; VWF antigen levels and FVIII activity increased after PVI with all the 3 techniques. The levels of soluble VCAM-1 (ng/ml) did not change after PVAC procedures, but increased after Cryo (542, 6; 428.5-753.1 versus 619.2; 499.8-799.0; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93.
Conclusion:
PVI with contemporary ablation techniques and periprocedural antithrombotic treatment induces coagulation and endothelium activation of similar magnitude with different ablation methods.
Related Concept Videos
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias

