Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
Registration accuracy between intraoral-scanned and cone-beam computed tomography-scanned crowns in various
Seung-Weon Lim1, Hyeon-Shik Hwang2, Il-Sik Cho3
1Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea; Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Introduction:
The purpose of this study was to investigate the registration accuracy between intraoral-scanned crowns and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-scanned crowns in various registration methods.
Methods:
The samples consisted of 18 Korean adult patients, whose pretreatment intraoral scans and CBCT images were available. A 3-dimensional (3D) dental model was fabricated using a TRIOS intraoral scanner (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and the OrthoAnalyzer program (version 1.7.1.4; 3Shape). After the CBCT image was taken, 3D volume rendering was performed to fabricate a 3D dental model using InVivo5 software (version 5.1; Anatomage, San Jose, Calif). Registration of the 3D dental crowns made from intraoral- and CBCT-scanned images was performed with Rapidform 2006 software (Inus Technology, Seoul, Korea) by a single operator. According to registration methods, 3 groups were established: individual-arch-total-registration group, individual-arch-segment-registration group, and bimaxillary-arch-centric-occlusion-registration group (n = 18 per group). After the amounts of shell/shell deviation were obtained, the mixed model analysis of variance and Bonferroni correction were performed.
Results:
Although there was no significant difference in the registration accuracy between the individual-arch-total-registration group and individual-arch-segment-registration group, the bimaxillary-arch-centric-occlusion-registration group exhibited the lowest registration accuracy (maxillary and mandibular teeth, all 0.21 mm in the individual-arch-total-registration group; all 0.20 mm in the individual-arch-segment-registration group vs 0.26 mm and 0.25 mm in the bimaxillary-arch-centric-occlusion-registration group; P <0.001). Color-coded visualization charts exhibited that most red spots were localized on the occlusal surface of the posterior teeth in all 3 groups.
Conclusions:
When considering the registration accuracy and convenience of the process, the individual-arch-total-registration method can be regarded as an efficient tool when integrating CBCT-scanned crown and intraoral-scanned crown.
