Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Breath Collection from Children for Disease Biomarker Discovery
Published on: February 14, 2019
Use of portable gas analyzers during pediatric field testing
Bianca Dana Horongozo Itaborahy1, Renata Maba Gonçalves Wamosy1, Janaina Cristina Scalco1
1State University of Santa Catarina - UDESC, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Insights
Portable gas analyzers (PGA) did not affect performance in most pediatric field tests, but altered cardiorespiratory responses. These tests remain reproducible in children, though PGA use impacts results.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric exercise physiology
- Cardiorespiratory fitness assessment
- Field-based testing in children
Background:
- Field tests are crucial for assessing physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness in children.
- The use of portable gas analyzers (PGA) can provide detailed physiological data but may influence test performance.
- Understanding the impact of PGA on pediatric field tests is essential for accurate and reproducible assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance and cardiorespiratory responses of healthy children in field tests with and without a portable gas analyzer (PGA).
- To analyze the reproducibility of these field tests when performed with and without PGA.
- To evaluate the impact of PGA use on the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), modified shuttle walk test (MSWT), and ADL-Glittre for pediatrics (TGlittre-P).
Main Methods:
- Inclusion of healthy children aged 6 to 14 years.
- Division into two groups: those performing tests with a PGA (GK) and those without (GS).
- Utilized the 6MWT, MSWT, and TGlittre-P for performance and cardiorespiratory response evaluation.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in 6MWT and MSWT performance between groups; however, cardiorespiratory responses were altered.
- The TGlittre-P was completed faster by the group using PGA (GK).
- All three tests demonstrated good intragroup reproducibility, but intergroup agreement (with vs. without PGA) was lacking.
Conclusions:
- PGA use resulted in a shorter completion time for the TGlittre-P in children.
- Cardiorespiratory performance and response in the 6MWT and MSWT were not significantly affected by PGA use.
- While the field tests are reproducible within individuals, the use of PGA impacts comparability between testing conditions.
Objective:
To compare performance and cardiorespiratory responses in field tests performed by healthy children, with and without the use of a portable gas analyzer (PGA), and to analyze the reproducibility of the tests.
Method:
The study included healthy children aged 6 to 14 years old. The sample was divided into children who underwent field tests (modified shuttle walk test [MSWT], 6-minute walk test [6MWT], and ADL-Glittre for pediatrics [TGlittre-P]) without PGA (GS) and children who carried the equipment K4b2 -COSMED, Rome, Italy (GK).
Results:
A total of 120 children participated in the study, 31 in the GK (mean age 10.16 ± 1.81 years old) and 89 in GS (mean age 10.1 ± 1.79 years old). The groups did not differ from each other and there was no significant difference in the performance of the 6MWT and MSWT intergroup (P > .05), but the significant alteration in the variables of the cardiorespiratory response was identified. In the TGlittre-P, the GK completed the test in a shorter time than the GS (2.69 ± 0.38 minutes vs 2.91 ± 0.40 minutes) and both presented alterations in most cardiorespiratory variables. The intragroup reproducibility showed concordance in all tests, and there was no concordance between groups (P > .05).
Conclusion:
The use of PGA had a lower time spent on TGlittre-P. In the 6MWT and MSWT, there was no difference in cardiorespiratory performance and response with and without the use of PGA. The three field tests were reproducible, but the same test, with and without the use of PGA, did not show agreement.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
05:00Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
Published on: July 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Flame Photometry: Lab