Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Improvement of image quality and diagnostic confidence using Smart MAR - a projection-based CT protocol in patients
Felix W Feldhaus1, Georg Böning1, Johannes Kahn1
1Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Background:
In computed tomography (CT) scans, artifacts caused by metallic orthopedic implants still hamper the visualization of important, periprosthetic tissues. Smart MAR metal artifact reduction tool is a promising three-stage, projection-based, post-processing algorithm.
Purpose:
To determine whether the Smart MAR tool improves subjective and objective image quality and diagnostic confidence in patients with orthopedic implants of the hip, spine, and shoulder.
Material And Methods:
Seventy-two patients with orthopedic screws, hip/shoulder replacement, or spine spondylodesis were included. CT scans were performed on a single-source multislice CT scanner, raw data were post-processed using Smart MAR. Image quality was evaluated both quantitatively (ROI-based) and qualitatively (rater-based) and compared to iterative reconstructions (ASIR V). As comparative standard for artificial prosthetic breaks or loosening, follow-up examinations were used.
Results:
Smart MAR reconstructions of the hip (n = 23), spine (n = 26), and shoulder (n = 23) showed a significantly reduced attenuation and noise of regions adjacent to metallic implants (P<0.002). Subjective image quality (P<0.005, shoulder P = 0.038/P = 0.046) and overall diagnostic confidence were higher in Smart MAR (all regions P<0.002). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; P = 0.72/P = 0.96) was not improved. Compared to standard ASIR V new, artificial metal extinctions (up to 50%) or periprosthetic hem lines (48%-73%) were introduced by Smart MAR.
Conclusion:
Smart MAR improved image quality of the hip, spine, and shoulder CT scans resulting in higher diagnostic confidence in evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissues. As shown for spine implants, it should be used with caution and as a complementary tool for evaluation of periprosthetic loosening or integrity of metal implant, as in many cases it introduced new artifacts.
More Related Videos
08:19Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
Published on: May 17, 2018
18:40Combined In vivo Optical and µCT Imaging to Monitor Infection, Inflammation, and Bone Anatomy in an Orthopaedic Implant Infection in Mice
Published on: October 16, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...