Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-impact physical activity participation and 12-month risk of joint replacement: a longitudinal mediation analysis of 17 661 patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis.

British journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Interpretable side-aware kinematic-sEMG gait-state representations relevant to adaptive neurorobotic assistance after stroke: a public-dataset study.

Frontiers in neurorobotics·2026
Same author

Robot-Assisted Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cortical Reorganization and Neuroplasticity Biomarkers.

Neural plasticity·2026
Same author

Eye-Tracking Technologies for Cognitive Assessment After Acquired Brain Injury: Systematic Review.

JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies·2026
Same author

Does pain alter the spatial distribution of muscle activity in people experiencing spinal pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2026
Same author

Multimodal physiotherapy versus scapular and conventional exercise for persistent pain following breast cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
06:28

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Published on: December 13, 2024

1.0K

Interpretable machine learning models for classifying low back pain status using functional physiological variables.

Bernard X W Liew1, David Rugamer2,3, Alessandro Marco De Nunzio4

  • 1School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, Essex, UK. bl19622@essex.ac.uk.

European Spine Journal : Official Publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
|March 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical models accurately distinguished low back pain (LBP) subtypes from healthy controls using electromyography (EMG) and kinematic data during lifting. These models can identify movement impairments linked to LBP risk.

Keywords:
BiomechanicsFunctional regressionLiftingLow back painMachine learningMotor control

More Related Videos

Back Mechanical Sensitivity Assessment in the Rat for Mechanistic Investigation of Chronic Back Pain
05:10

Back Mechanical Sensitivity Assessment in the Rat for Mechanistic Investigation of Chronic Back Pain

Published on: August 30, 2022

3.3K
Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
04:42

Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation

Published on: June 26, 2018

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 27, 2025

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
06:28

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Published on: December 13, 2024

1.0K
Back Mechanical Sensitivity Assessment in the Rat for Mechanistic Investigation of Chronic Back Pain
05:10

Back Mechanical Sensitivity Assessment in the Rat for Mechanistic Investigation of Chronic Back Pain

Published on: August 30, 2022

3.3K
Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
04:42

Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation

Published on: June 26, 2018

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Rehabilitation Science
  • Data Science in Healthcare

Background:

  • Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition with diverse subtypes.
  • Understanding the physiological differences between LBP subtypes and healthy individuals is crucial for targeted interventions.
  • Electromyography (EMG) and kinematic data offer insights into movement patterns during functional tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the predictive accuracy of statistical models in differentiating LBP subtypes from healthy controls.
  • To utilize time-varying electromyographic and kinematic signals as predictors for LBP classification.
  • To identify key muscle activation and movement patterns associated with different LBP statuses.

Main Methods:

  • Collected motion capture and EMG data from 49 participants (16 healthy controls, 16 remission LBP, 17 current LBP) during a low-load lifting task.
  • Developed three statistical models using functional data boosting (FDboost) for binary classification (control vs. LBP, control vs. remission LBP, remission LBP vs. LBP).
  • Utilized 40 kinematic and EMG variables, with 31-32 predictors included after addressing collinearity and incorporating sex as a covariate.

Main Results:

  • Model 1 (control vs. LBP) achieved an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 90.4% with 7 EMG predictors, highlighting biceps femoris.
  • Model 2 (control vs. remission LBP) achieved an AUC of 91.2% with 9 predictors, with deltoid as most influential.
  • Model 3 (remission LBP vs. LBP) achieved a high AUC of 96.7% with 7 predictors, identifying iliocostalis as the key predictor.

Conclusions:

  • Statistical models effectively predict LBP subtypes using EMG and kinematic data during lifting.
  • The identified influential muscles (biceps femoris, deltoid, iliocostalis) represent key movement impairments.
  • Translating physiological differences into clinical insights can guide future prognostic research for LBP.