Comparison of Combination Weil Metatarsal Osteotomy and Direct Plantar Plate Repair Versus Weil Metatarsal Osteotomy...

Although many surgeons believe that shortening osteotomies are appropriate in patients with metatarsalgia and long second metatarsals, there remains ambiguity regarding when to repair the injured plantar plate and when to leave it alone. We prospectively assessed consecutive adult subjects who underwent an isolated second Weil metatarsal osteotomy (WMO) or a WMO plus plantar plate repair (WMO + PPR) for sub-second metatarsophalangeal joint pain during a 3.5-year period at our practice. Eighty-six patients (86 feet: 21 WMO only and 65 WMO + PPR) with a mean age of 61 ± 11 years were followed for 1 year. Patients were assessed via use of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score and radiographic parabola/alignment of the operative digit preoperatively and postoperatively. Patients in the WMO + PPR group demonstrated significant improvements preoperatively to postoperatively in 4 of the 5 FAOS subscales (Pain, Other Symptoms, Sport and Recreation Function, and Ankle- and Foot-Related Quality of Life [QoL], all p < .05) and had higher QoL and Pain subscale scores at 1 year compared with those in the WMO-only group (QoL: 68.6 ± 26.7 versus 49.7 ± 28.5, respectively [p = .01]; Pain: 83.2 ± 14.5 versus 73.6 ± 19.9, respectively [p = .04]). The WMO + PPR group tended to have higher-grade tears on intraoperative inspection (median 3, range 0 to 4) compared with those in the WMO group (median 1, range 0 to 3). There were otherwise no group differences in preoperative or postoperative radiographic parabola, alignment of the second toe, or complication rates. Our findings suggest that when a shortening osteotomy is performed, imbricating/repairing and advancing the plantar plate may be valuable regardless of injury grade in the plate.