Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 27, 2025
Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp Curriculum
Published on: March 12, 2018
Debriefing methods and learning outcomes in simulation nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis
JuHee Lee1, Hyejung Lee2, Sue Kim3
1Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, 510 College of Nursing, Yonsei-ro 50, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Objectives:
Simulation can serve as an effective educational method to provide experience and opportunities to learn about the nursing management of clinical cases in a secure environment. Numerous debriefing methods have been used in simulation in nurse education to improve clinical competencies and learning outcomes. However, there is insufficient evidence to identify the debriefing methods that are most effective in improving learning outcomes. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the focus is on debriefing methods and learning outcomes in simulation in nurse education.
Design:
This systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement.
Data Sources:
Studies published from January 1995 to December 2016 were identified from PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and Korean databases.
Review Methods:
Experimental studies that used debriefing methods in simulation in nurse education were included as review studies. Studies that used identical validated measurement tools were included in the meta-analysis. We applied a random-effects model with subgroups. Effect sizes for learning outcomes according to debriefing methods were calculated using standardized mean differences.
Results:
A total of 18 studies were selected through systematic review and 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis using four types of scales measuring learning outcomes after debriefing. The overall effect size of the learning outcomes, according to the type of debriefing method, was 0.31. The results regarding debriefing methods were statistically non-significant in the learning outcomes (95% CI [-0.33-0.96], Z = 0.95, p = 0.34). A symmetric shape indicated a lack of publication bias.
Conclusions:
The study findings indicated that structured debriefing helped to improve learning. Future studies are needed to provide effective debriefing strategies with larger sample sizes.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
01:15Nursing Evaluation
01:24Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...
01:08Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
01:18The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
01:24Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation