Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Evaluation of Host-Pathogen Responses and Vaccine Efficacy in Mice
Published on: February 22, 2019
Are placebo controls necessary in controlled human infection trials for vaccines?
Marijke C C Langenberg1, Olaf M Dekkers2, Meta Roestenberg3
1Department of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Abstract:
Controlled human infection trials, whereby a small group of healthy participants is deliberately exposed to a pathogen under controlled circumstances, can provide preliminary data for vaccine efficacy and for the selection of the most promising candidate vaccines for field trials. Because of the potential harm to participants through the deliberate exposure to a pathogen, the use of smaller groups minimises the cumulative risk. As such, a control group that receives a placebo vaccine followed by controlled exposure to a pathogen should be scientifically well justified. As these types of trials are designed to generate consistent infection rates and thus comparable outcomes across populations and trial sites, data from past studies (historical data) could be used as a valid alternative to placebo groups. In this Personal View, we review this option and highlight the considerations for choosing historical data as a suitable control. For the widespread application of this method, responsibility for the centralisation and sharing of data from controlled human infection trials lies with the scientific community.
Insights
Controlled human infection trials can use historical data instead of placebo groups to assess vaccine efficacy. This approach minimizes participant risk while ensuring scientifically valid outcomes for vaccine development.
Area of Science:
- Vaccinology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Controlled human infection trials (CHITs) are crucial for early vaccine efficacy assessment.
- Participant safety is paramount, necessitating small group sizes and ethical controls.
- Traditional CHITs often employ placebo groups, raising ethical and logistical considerations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the scientific justification and considerations for using historical data as a control in CHITs.
- To propose historical data as a viable alternative to placebo groups in vaccine development.
- To advocate for data sharing and centralization within the scientific community for CHITs.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and ethical frameworks for CHITs.
- Analysis of the scientific validity of using historical infection rate data.
- Discussion of the practical implementation of historical data controls.
Main Results:
- Historical data can provide a scientifically sound alternative to placebo controls in CHITs.
- Using historical data minimizes cumulative risk to participants by reducing the need for large control groups.
- Consistent infection rates in CHITs support the use of historical data for comparable outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Historical data offers a robust and ethical alternative to placebo groups in controlled human infection trials.
- Widespread adoption requires centralizing and sharing data from CHITs.
- This approach can accelerate the selection of promising vaccine candidates for further development.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
06:37Using Reference Reagents to Confirm Robustness of Cytokine Release Assays for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Safety
Published on: September 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blinding
Controls in Experiments
Blind Procedures
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...