Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Rapid Detection of Fecal Antigen of Helicobacter pylori Infection Based on Double Antibody Sandwich Detection Technology
Published on: May 23, 2025
Is the Utilization of Helicobacter pylori Stool Antigen Tests Appropriate in an Urban Canadian Population?
Irene Ma1, Maggie Guo1, Dylan R Pillai2,1,3,4
1Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary, Canada.
Insights
The Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test (HpSAT) shows varied appropriateness across demographics in Calgary. Some at-risk groups, like recent immigrants, were tested appropriately, while others, like males, may have been undertested, potentially missing cases.
Area of Science:
- Clinical microbiology
- Public health surveillance
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- The Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test (HpSAT) is a key diagnostic tool.
- Assessing the appropriateness of diagnostic testing is crucial for healthcare resource allocation and patient outcomes.
- Understanding testing patterns and positivity rates can reveal disparities in healthcare access and utilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the appropriateness of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen testing in Calgary, Canada.
- To analyze testing and positivity rates of HpSAT across different sociodemographic groups.
- To establish a framework for evaluating diagnostic test appropriateness using concordance analysis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of laboratory data for all HpSATs performed in Calgary in 2018.
- Collection of patient data including age, sex, testing volume, and results.
- Sociodemographic and geospatial analysis by linking laboratory data with 2016 census data to assess testing appropriateness based on concordance of testing and positivity rates.
Main Results:
- Over 25,000 HpSATs were conducted in 2018, with an overall positivity rate of 14.7%.
- Geospatial mapping revealed significant variations in testing and positivity rates across Calgary.
- Certain groups, such as recent immigrants, showed appropriate testing and high positivity rates, while males appeared undertested relative to their positivity rate.
Conclusions:
- Concordance analysis of testing and positivity rates is a valuable method for assessing diagnostic test appropriateness.
- The study identified potential gaps in H. pylori testing, indicating that some at-risk populations may be missed.
- Findings suggest a need for targeted strategies to improve equitable access to H. pylori diagnostics.
Objectives:
Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test (HpSAT) appropriateness was investigated by assessing its testing and positivity rates in Calgary, Canada.
Methods:
The laboratory information system was accessed for all patients who received an HpSAT in 2018. Testing volume, test results, age, and sex of patients were collected. Sociodemographic risk factors and geospatial analysis were performed by matching laboratory data to the 2016 census data. Testing appropriateness was defined as a concordance between testing and positivity rates for each sociodemographic variable.
Results:
In 2018, 25,518 H pylori stool antigen tests were performed in Calgary, with an overall positivity rate of 14.7%. Geospatial mapping demonstrated significant distribution variations of testing and positivity rates of HpSAT in the city. Certain sociodemographic groups studied (eg, recent immigrants) appeared to be appropriately tested (testing rate relative risk [RR] = 2.26, positivity rate RR = 4.32; P < .0001), while other groups (eg, male) may have been undertested (testing rate RR = 0.85, positivity rate RR = 1.14; P < .0001).
Conclusions:
Determining concordance of testing and positivity rate of a laboratory test can be used for assessing testing appropriateness for other diseases in other jurisdictions. This study demonstrated some at-risk patients may be missed for H pylori testing.
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test

