Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

The Placebo Effect01:54

The Placebo Effect

6.7K
The placebo effect occurs when people's expectations or beliefs influence or determine their experience in a given situation. In other words, simply expecting something to happen can actually make it happen.
6.7K
Nociception01:44

Nociception

32.8K
Nociception—the ability to feel pain—is essential for an organism’s survival and overall well-being. Noxious stimuli such as piercing pain from a sharp object, heat from an open flame, or contact with corrosive chemicals are first detected by sensory receptors, called nociceptors, located on nerve endings. Nociceptors express ion channels that convert noxious stimuli into electrical signals. When these signals reach the brain via sensory neurons, they are perceived as pain.
32.8K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

12.7K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.7K
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects01:12

Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects

703
While local anesthetics are generally safe and well-tolerated, they can occasionally cause adverse effects that vary in severity. Local anesthetics can induce toxicity at two distinct levels. They can either produce local effects through direct contact with the neural elements or be absorbed into the bloodstream from the injection site, leading to systemic effects.
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
703
Blinding01:11

Blinding

3.8K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
3.8K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

48.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
48.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Revisiting the Ethics of Urate-Lowering Therapy Clinical Trials for Gout Management.

Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Why We Explain.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2023
Same author

A Call to Revise <i>the Declaration of Helsinki's</i> Placebo Guidelines.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2023
Same author

Recommendations for the development, implementation, and reporting of control interventions in efficacy and mechanistic trials of physical, psychological, and self-management therapies: the CoPPS Statement.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2023
Same author

Disability and uncertainty: How to proceed when we do not know.

Surgery·2022
Same author

The Pandemic Dilemma: When Philosophy Conflicts with Public Health.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2022
Same journal

Sentience. Not Necessarily a Problem?

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

No Need to Feel.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

The One Health Paradigm and Wild Animal Welfare Science.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

From Mollusks to Machines: An Ethical Framework Focused on the Urgency of Extreme Suffering.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

Sentience and Why It Matters.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

The Wrong Motives for Potentially Harming a Being.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 26, 2025

How to Study Placebo Responses in Motion Sickness with a Rotation Chair Paradigm in Healthy Participants
08:50

How to Study Placebo Responses in Motion Sickness with a Rotation Chair Paradigm in Healthy Participants

Published on: December 14, 2014

9.6K

Commentary: Harm, Truth, and the Nocebo Effect.

Dien Ho

    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics : CQ : the International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees
    |March 12, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The nocebo effect, where negative expectations cause adverse reactions, poses an ethical dilemma for clinicians. Informing patients about side effects respects autonomy but may increase the risk of experiencing them.

    More Related Videos

    Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety
    10:51

    Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety

    Published on: January 20, 2012

    21.7K
    Teasing Out the Interplay Between Natural Killer Cells and Nociceptor Neurons
    09:40

    Teasing Out the Interplay Between Natural Killer Cells and Nociceptor Neurons

    Published on: June 30, 2022

    2.6K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 26, 2025

    How to Study Placebo Responses in Motion Sickness with a Rotation Chair Paradigm in Healthy Participants
    08:50

    How to Study Placebo Responses in Motion Sickness with a Rotation Chair Paradigm in Healthy Participants

    Published on: December 14, 2014

    9.6K
    Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety
    10:51

    Real-time fMRI Biofeedback Targeting the Orbitofrontal Cortex for Contamination Anxiety

    Published on: January 20, 2012

    21.7K
    Teasing Out the Interplay Between Natural Killer Cells and Nociceptor Neurons
    09:40

    Teasing Out the Interplay Between Natural Killer Cells and Nociceptor Neurons

    Published on: June 30, 2022

    2.6K

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Psychosomatic Medicine
    • Clinical Psychology

    Background:

    • Nocebo effects involve negative physiological responses triggered by non-therapeutic aspects of a treatment.
    • Research indicates that disclosing potential side effects can heighten the likelihood of their occurrence in patients.
    • This phenomenon presents a complex ethical challenge for healthcare providers.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the ethical considerations surrounding the disclosure of treatment side effects.
    • To analyze the conflict between patient autonomy and the principle of non-maleficence in the context of nocebo effects.
    • To examine the impact of information disclosure on patient outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of studies on nocebo effects and informed consent.
    • Ethical analysis of clinical disclosure practices.
    • Examination of patient autonomy and harm minimization principles.

    Main Results:

    • Disclosure of side effects is linked to an increased incidence of nocebo responses.
    • Balancing the duty to inform with the duty to prevent harm is a significant ethical challenge.
    • Patient autonomy requires informed consent, but this can inadvertently increase patient suffering.

    Conclusions:

    • Healthcare providers must navigate the ethical complexities of informing patients about potential negative outcomes.
    • Strategies are needed to mitigate nocebo effects while upholding ethical disclosure standards.
    • Further research is essential to reconcile patient autonomy with minimizing iatrogenic harm.