Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I01:27

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I

1.3K
In healthcare, informed consent is a crucial process that involves thoroughly communicating medical treatment options to patients, including benefits, risks, potential side effects, and alternatives. This process enables patients to make well-informed decisions about their care, ensuring they understand the implications of their choices before consenting to or refusing treatment.
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
1.3K
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

1.7K
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
1.7K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

35.1K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
35.1K
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

2.0K
Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
2.0K
Nursing Ethical Principles I01:22

Nursing Ethical Principles I

3.6K
Ethical principles serve as the moral compass in the longstanding tradition of nursing, guiding healthcare professionals in their interactions with patients and families. These principles, namely autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, provide a robust framework for navigating the ethical complexities of daily nursing practice.
Autonomy
Autonomy underscores the significance of a patient's self-determination and freedom from external control. In healthcare, respecting...
3.6K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

25.3K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nudging, the Nocebo Effect, and Ambivalence.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2022
Same author

A Nudge Without a Wink!

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2020
Same author

Evidence-Based Nudging: Best Practices in Informed Consent.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2015
Same author

What's in a Name? Conceptual Confusion About Death and Consent in Donation After Cardiac Determination of Death.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2015
Same author

Clinical equipoise: actual or hypothetical disagreement?

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2013
Same journal

Sentience. Not Necessarily a Problem?

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

No Need to Feel.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

The One Health Paradigm and Wild Animal Welfare Science.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

From Mollusks to Machines: An Ethical Framework Focused on the Urgency of Extreme Suffering.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

Sentience and Why It Matters.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

The Wrong Motives for Potentially Harming a Being.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness
04:04

Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: July 11, 2025

1.1K

The Nocebo Effect and Informed Consent-Taking Autonomy Seriously.

Scott Gelfand

    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics : CQ : the International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees
    |March 12, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The nocebo effect, where knowing about side effects increases their likelihood, challenges medical ethics. This study proposes a new method to manage this effect, balancing patient autonomy and nonmaleficence.

    Keywords:
    duty of informed consentduty of nonmaleficencenocebo dilemmanocebo effectpatient autonomyside effectswithholding information

    More Related Videos

    A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
    08:42

    A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

    Published on: July 31, 2017

    8.6K
    Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
    07:48

    Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

    Published on: November 26, 2015

    10.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 26, 2025

    Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness
    04:04

    Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness

    Published on: July 11, 2025

    1.1K
    A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
    08:42

    A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

    Published on: July 31, 2017

    8.6K
    Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
    07:48

    Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

    Published on: November 26, 2015

    10.3K

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Pharmacology

    Background:

    • The nocebo effect, where awareness of potential side effects heightens their occurrence, presents a significant ethical dilemma in patient care.
    • Physicians face a conflict between the duty to respect patient autonomy (informed consent) and the duty of nonmaleficence (avoiding harm).
    • Previous strategies for managing the nocebo effect have demonstrated notable weaknesses.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate existing approaches to managing the nocebo effect.
    • To introduce and advocate for a novel strategy to mitigate the nocebo effect in clinical practice.
    • To provide clinicians with practical tools for navigating the ethical complexities of the nocebo effect.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of previous nocebo effect management strategies.
    • Ethical analysis of physician duties regarding informed consent and harm reduction.
    • Proposal and justification of a new management approach.

    Main Results:

    • Identified limitations in current methods for addressing the nocebo effect.
    • Developed a proposed management strategy designed to overcome the shortcomings of prior approaches.
    • Outlined a practical tool to aid clinicians in managing the nocebo effect.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed management strategy offers a viable solution to the nocebo effect dilemma.
    • The new approach effectively balances patient autonomy and the principle of nonmaleficence.
    • A practical tool is presented to support clinicians in ethically managing side effect disclosures.