Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Space-Time Curvature and the General Theory of Relativity01:17

Space-Time Curvature and the General Theory of Relativity

4.0K
In 1905, Albert Einstein published his special theory of relativity. According to this theory, no matter in the universe can attain a speed greater than the speed of light in a vacuum, which thus serves as the speed limit of the universe.
This has been verified in many experiments. However, space and time are no longer absolute. Two observers moving relative to one another do not agree on the length of objects or the passage of time. The mechanics of objects based on Newton's laws of...
4.0K
Newton's Law of Gravitation01:15

Newton's Law of Gravitation

16.6K
Our everyday observation tells us that all objects close to the Earth naturally tend to fall to the ground. Early philosophers assumed that this downward force was unique to Earth. By the 16th century, Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) put forward the heliocentric theory, which suggested that Earth and other planets orbited the sun, while the Moon orbited the Earth. However, it was Isaac Newton (1642-1727) who linked these two motions together in the 17th century. He reasoned that the force of...
16.6K
Gravitation Between Spherically Symmetric Masses01:14

Gravitation Between Spherically Symmetric Masses

1.2K
The gravitational potential energy between two spherically symmetric bodies can be calculated from the masses and the distance between the bodies, assuming that the center of mass is concentrated at the respective centers of the bodies.
1.2K
Gravity between Spherical Bodies01:27

Gravity between Spherical Bodies

9.2K
Newton's law of gravitation describes the gravitational force between any two point masses. However, for extended spherical objects like the Earth, the Moon, and other planets, the law holds with an assumption that masses of spherical objects are concentrated at their respective centers.
This assumption can be proved easily by showing that the expression for gravitational potential energy between a hollow sphere of mass (M) and a point mass (m) is the same as it would be for a pair of extended...
9.2K
Detection of Black Holes01:10

Detection of Black Holes

2.5K
Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
2.5K
Reduced Mass Coordinates: Isolated Two-body Problem01:12

Reduced Mass Coordinates: Isolated Two-body Problem

2.2K
In classical mechanics, the two-body problem is one of the fundamental problems describing the motion of two interacting bodies under gravity or any other central force. When considering the motion of two bodies, one of the most important concepts is the reduced mass coordinates, a quantity that allows the two-body problem to be solved like a single-body problem. In these circumstances, it is assumed that a single body with reduced mass revolves around another body fixed in a position with an...
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A numerical investigation of electric field effects on spray jet flames with charged fuel droplets.

International journal of spray and combustion dynamics·2026
Same author

Building healthier communities: effectiveness and cost-sustainability of the ASL3 GENESIS program for chronic diseases prevention.

Aging clinical and experimental research·2026
Same author

Mixed endometrial carcinoma: is it time to profile the two components separately?

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Semaglutide 2.4 mg for Obese Patients with MASH: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from the Italian NHS Perspective.

ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR·2026
Same author

Data-driven inference of digital twins for high-throughput phenotyping of motile and light-responsive microorganisms.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same author

Temporomandibular Disorders and Orofacial Outcomes in Subjects with Neck Pain and/or Cervicogenic Headache: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
07:46

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

8.9K

Do solar system experiments constrain scalar-tensor gravity?

Valerio Faraoni1, Jeremy Côté1,2, Andrea Giusti1

  • 11Department of Physics and Astronomy, Bishop's University, 2600 College Street, Sherbrooke, QC J1M 1Z7 Canada.

The European Physical Journal. C, Particles and Fields
|March 14, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Contrary to popular belief, Brans-Dicke gravity does not simplify to general relativity (GR) for large coupling values. Higher-order effects show Brans-Dicke gravity never truly equals GR, impacting gravity tests.

More Related Videos

Experimental Methods for Efficient Solar Hydrogen Production in Microgravity Environment
11:38

Experimental Methods for Efficient Solar Hydrogen Production in Microgravity Environment

Published on: December 3, 2019

8.0K
Scattering And Absorption of Light in Planetary Regoliths
11:34

Scattering And Absorption of Light in Planetary Regoliths

Published on: July 1, 2019

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
07:46

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

8.9K
Experimental Methods for Efficient Solar Hydrogen Production in Microgravity Environment
11:38

Experimental Methods for Efficient Solar Hydrogen Production in Microgravity Environment

Published on: December 3, 2019

8.0K
Scattering And Absorption of Light in Planetary Regoliths
11:34

Scattering And Absorption of Light in Planetary Regoliths

Published on: July 1, 2019

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Theoretical physics
  • Gravitational physics
  • Cosmology

Background:

  • Scalar-tensor theories, like Brans-Dicke gravity, are alternatives to Einstein's general relativity (GR).
  • Experimental tests often assume Brans-Dicke gravity converges to GR for large coupling constants ().
  • The parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism is crucial for analyzing these tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the validity of the GR limit in Brans-Dicke gravity under the PPN formalism.
  • To determine if the assumption of equivalence between large and GR limits holds.
  • To assess the implications for experimental tests of gravity, particularly concerning light deflection and Shapiro time delay.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Brans-Dicke gravity within the linearized PPN approximation.
  • Inclusion of second-order and higher-order terms in the PPN expansion.
  • Examination of strong gravity regimes.

Main Results:

  • The anomaly between Brans-Dicke gravity and GR disappears in the linearized PPN approximation.
  • However, the anomaly persists at second-order and higher, and in strong gravity.
  • Brans-Dicke gravity, even for large , does not reduce to GR when higher-order PPN terms are considered.

Conclusions:

  • The assumption that Brans-Dicke gravity reduces to GR for large is flawed beyond the linearized approximation.
  • Experimental tests relying on the PPN formalism may need re-evaluation, especially those testing higher-order effects.
  • Scalar-tensor gravity theories may exhibit distinct gravitational phenomena not captured by standard GR limits.