Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Prognostic Indices for Advance Care Planning in Primary Care: A Scoping Review
Peter Kim1, Jeanette M Daly1, Maresi A Berry-Stoelzle1
1From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA (PK, JMD, MAB-S, MES, BTL); Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA (BTL); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR (LCM); Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR (DAD).
Background:
Patient identification is an important step for advance care planning (ACP) discussions.
Objectives:
We conducted a scoping review to identify prognostic indices potentially useful for initiating ACP.
Methods:
We included studies that developed and/or validated a multivariable prognostic index for all-cause mortality between 6 months and 5 years in community-dwelling adults. PubMed was searched in October 2018 for articles meeting our search criteria. If a systematic review was identified from the search, we checked for additional eligible articles in its references. We abstracted data on population studied, discrimination, calibration, where to find the index, and variables included. Each index was further assessed for clinical usability.
Results:
We identified 18 articles with a total of 17 unique prognostic indices after screening 9154 titles. The majority of indices (88%) had c-statistics greater than or equal to 0.70. Only 1 index was externally validated. Ten indices, 8 developed in the United States and 2 in the United Kingdom, were considered clinically usable.
Conclusion:
Of the 17 unique prognostic indices, 10 may be useful for implementation in the primary care setting to identify patients who may benefit from ACP discussions. An index classified as "clinically usable" may not be easy to use because of a large number of variables that are not routinely collected and the need to program the index into the electronic medical record.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Planning Nursing Care I
Planning Nursing Care II
Cancer Survival Analysis
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities