Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

05:07
Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
Published on: November 7, 2025
246
DV200 Index for Assessing RNA Integrity in Next-Generation Sequencing.
Takehiro Matsubara1, Junichi Soh2,3, Mizuki Morita4
1Okayama University Hospital Biobank, Okayama University Hospital, Japan.
Biomed Research International
|March 19, 2020
Summary
The DV200 metric is superior to the RNA Integrity Number equivalent (RINe) for assessing RNA quality in next-generation sequencing (NGS) library preparation. DV200 offers better prediction of library yield, especially for low-quality RNA samples.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Accurate next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis relies on high-quality biological samples.
- Evaluating RNA integrity is crucial for reliable NGS results.
- Common RNA quality metrics include RNA Integrity Number equivalent (RINe) and DV200.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of RINe and DV200 as RNA quality indicators for NGS analysis.
- To determine the most suitable RNA quality index for predicting successful library production.
Main Methods:
- Seventy-one RNA samples from diverse sources (FFPE, fresh-frozen, cell lines) were analyzed.
- RNA quality was assessed using both RINe and DV200 metrics.
- Stranded mRNA sequencing libraries were prepared, and the correlation between RNA quality indices and library yield was calculated.
Main Results:
- DV200 demonstrated a stronger correlation with the amount of library product (R² = 0.8208) compared to RINe (R² = 0.6927).
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated DV200 is a better predictor of efficient library production.
- Optimal cutoffs were identified: DV200 > 66.1% and RINe > 2.3 for predicting efficient library production.
Conclusions:
- DV200 is a more reliable indicator than RINe for assessing RNA quality for NGS library preparation.
- RNA samples with DV200 > 66.1% yield more sensitive and specific NGS libraries compared to those with RINe > 2.3.
- DV200 is particularly advantageous for evaluating low-quality RNA samples.

