Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...

Control System Problem

Control System Problem

In an open-loop system, such as a basic thermostat, the poles of the transfer function influence the system's response but do not determine its stability. However, when feedback is introduced to form a closed-loop system, such as an advanced thermostat that adjusts heating based on room temperature, stability is governed by the new poles of the closed-loop transfer function.
When forming a closed-loop system, issues can arise if the poles cross into the unstable region, leading to potential...

Mate Choice

Mate Choice

Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Evolution of Long-Term Care and Health Policy in the United States.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2025

Same author

The Changing Role of the Government in American Health Law.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2025

Same author

A review of public comments submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in response to the 2022 National Coverage Decision on treatment for Alzheimer's disease.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2025

Same author

The Scope and Legal Implications of Tracking Technologies on Hospital Websites.

JAMA·2023

Same author

Ethical and Regulatory Issues for Embedded Pragmatic Trials Involving People Living with Dementia.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2020

Same author

Long-Term Care Policy after Covid-19 - Solving the Nursing Home Crisis.

The New England journal of medicine·2020

Same journal

Still Learning from Oregonians About Medicaid.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026

Same journal

Communicative Infrastructure and the Global Diffusion of Latin American Food Policy.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026

Same journal

Frankenstein or My Fair Lady? Lessons on Participatory Governance from Oregon Medicaid's Priority-Setting Experiment.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026

Same journal

How Medicare Advantage Enrollment Affects Spending in Traditional Medicare: Spillovers and Implications for MA Benchmarks.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026

Same journal

Abortion Politics: Physician Mobilization in the Wake of the Dobbs Decision.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026

Same journal

When Protections Work but Processes Stall: Evaluating the No Surprises Act's Implementation Record.

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Choice and No-Choice Assays for Testing the Resistance of A. thaliana to Chewing Insects

Choice and No-Choice Assays for Testing the Resistance of A. thaliana to Chewing Insects

Published on: May 14, 2008

The ACA's Choice Problem.

Allison K Hoffman¹

¹University of Pennsylvania.

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

|March 19, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded healthcare access but reinforced problematic "choice" in insurance. This focus on choice creates bureaucracy and offers illusory benefits, hindering effective US health policy.

Keywords:

ACA Affordable Care Act choice health insurance managed competition

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Choice and No-Choice Assays for Testing the Resistance of A. thaliana to Chewing Insects

Choice and No-Choice Assays for Testing the Resistance of A. thaliana to Chewing Insects

Published on: May 14, 2008

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

Area of Science:

Health Policy and Regulation
American Health Insurance Market
Socioeconomics of Healthcare

Background:

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) successfully increased health insurance coverage for millions.
However, the ACA's reforms amplified a core issue in US health policy: an overemphasis on consumer choice in health plans.
This focus on choice, while popular, presents significant challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically examine the problematic aspects of the ACA's reinforcement of choice in health insurance.
To analyze the pragmatic, bureaucratic, and philosophical/sociological consequences of this emphasis on choice.
To assess the implications for the future of US health policy.

Main Methods:

Analysis of health policy theory regarding consumer choice in insurance markets.
Examination of the regulatory structures created to support health plan choice.
Philosophical and sociological critique of the goal of preserving choice in health regulation.

Main Results:

Health policy theory suggests choice among health plans yields benefits that are not realized in practice.
Many individuals, regardless of education, struggle to make optimal health plan choices, leading to dissatisfaction.
The regulatory framework supporting choice has resulted in a large and complex market bureaucracy.
The ACA's emphasis on choice reinforces a potentially empty regulatory goal, prioritizing selection over substantive benefits.

Conclusions:

The ACA's focus on choice in health insurance, while expanding access, creates unintended negative consequences.
These consequences include pragmatic ineffectiveness, bureaucratic bloat, and a philosophical reinforcement of superficial choice.
This problematic cycle is likely to continue influencing US health policy discussions and reforms.