Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.5K

Optimising subjective anterior eye grading precision.

Marta Vianya-Estopa1, Manbir Nagra2, Arnold Cochrane3

  • 1Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.

Contact Lens & Anterior Eye : the Journal of the British Contact Lens Association
|March 29, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

The answer is 23 years - what is the question? Understanding the time lag between ophthalmic research and clinical adoption.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
Same authorSame journal

Effect of a head strap on the function of an eyelid warming compress.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
Same author

Gene-Environment Interaction Loci Associated with Refractive Error: SCAMPI Analysis.

Ophthalmology science·2026
Same author

Diagnostic utility of inflammation-associated clinical signs in detecting MMP-9 expression in dry eye disease: A cross-sectional conjunctival impression cytology and droplet digital PCR study.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
Same author

Women in vision networks: narrowing the global gender gap in academia.

Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Optimising slit-lamp biomicroscope fluorescein imaging filters.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
Same journal

Agreement in the classification of keratoconus severity: a comparative study based on anterior corneal surface topographic parameters.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
Same journal

Orthokeratology versus extended depth-of-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control: a 12-month comparative study of axial elongation and corneal changes.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
Same journal

Development of a model for the clinical prediction of contact lens discomfort.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
Same journal

Corneal nerve alterations in migraine: a systematic review of in vivo confocal microscopy and esthesiometry findings.

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

A 0.5 grading increment is recommended for grading anterior eye redness, balancing clinical precision and practitioner agreement. This finding aids in standardizing subjective assessments in eye care.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Accurate grading of anterior eye conditions is crucial for effective patient management.
  • Variability in grading scales can impact diagnostic consistency and treatment decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the optimal grading increment for subjective anterior eye redness.
  • To ensure consistency among eye care practitioners while maximizing clinical precision.

Main Methods:

  • Optometry students and qualified practitioners graded bulbar, limbal, and palpebral hyperaemia using different increments (0.1, 0.5, 1.0).
  • Live digital slit lamp images were used, with graders having limited time for each assessment.
  • A randomized sequence of patients and grading scales was employed, with graders masked to previous responses.
Keywords:
Eye-care practitionerGradingHyperaemiaScale incrementsStudent

More Related Videos

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

486
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.5K
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

486
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.7K

Main Results:

  • Grading to the nearest 0.5 increment improved precision for student graders compared to grading to the nearest integer.
  • Experienced practitioners showed consistent grading regardless of the increment for limbal hyperaemia.
  • Specific increments (0.1 or 0.5) were found to be superior for bulbar and palpebral hyperaemia grading.

Conclusions:

  • A 0.5 grading increment is recommended for subjective grading of anterior eye redness (limbal, bulbar, palpebral).
  • This increment balances the ability to detect small clinical changes with acceptable practitioner agreement.
  • Standardizing grading increments enhances the reliability of clinical assessments in optometry and ophthalmology.