Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.9K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.9K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.1K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.1K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.9K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.9K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

517
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
517
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

2.9K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
2.9K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.5K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Charting Cervical Spinal Cord Morphometry Across the Lifespan.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: White matter micro- and macrostructure brain charts for the human lifespan.

Nature·2026
Same author

White matter micro- and macrostructure brain charts for the human lifespan.

Nature·2026
Same author

A Novel, Variance Component-Based Method for Detecting Brain-Behavior Associations in Neuroimaging Data.

Statistics and data science in imaging·2026
Same author

Improved Estimation of Correlation Accuracy for Machine Learning Brain-Phenotype Associations.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

A sensorimotor basis for facial expressivity differences in autism.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same journal

Testing linear hypotheses in repeated measures generalized linear models using external information.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

When Do Unifactorial Items Increase the Reliability?

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Designs for Diagnostic Models: Identification and Estimation.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Modeling Rare Events and Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missingness of Time-Varying Outcomes and Predictors in Binary Time-Series Daily Diary Data: A Bayesian Selection Model.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Revelle's Beta: The Wait Is Over-Computation Becomes Possible.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

On dimensional implication graphs.

Psychometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.5K

A Robust Effect Size Index.

Simon Vandekar1, Ran Tao2, Jeffrey Blume2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, 2525 West End Ave., #1136, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA. simon.vandekar@vanderbilt.edu.

Psychometrika
|April 2, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new, robust effect size index that is unitless and generalizable across various statistical models. This advancement aims to standardize effect size communication in behavioral sciences, improving study design and reporting.

Keywords:
Cohen’s dM-estimatorR squaresemiparametricstandardized log odds

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K
Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
08:13

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.5K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K
Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting
08:13

Robust Comparison of Protein Levels Across Tissues and Throughout Development Using Standardized Quantitative Western Blotting

Published on: April 9, 2019

14.7K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Effect size indices are crucial for study design and reporting, offering unitless measures of association independent of sample size.
  • Current effect size indices are often tied to specific parametric models or population parameters, limiting their generalizability.
  • Existing estimators can be biased when parametric models are misspecified, such as with unknown heteroskedasticity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel, robust effect size index based on M-estimators.
  • To develop a generalizable, unitless effect size measure applicable across a wide range of statistical models.
  • To provide tools for calculating statistical power and sample size based on the new index.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a new effect size index using M-estimators.
  • Demonstrated the index's relationship with existing measures (Cohen's d, standardized log odds ratio) under correct model specification.
  • Utilized simulations to evaluate the bias and standard error of the proposed estimator in finite samples.

Main Results:

  • The proposed effect size index is unitless and invariant across different statistical models.
  • The new index functions as Cohen's d or standardized log odds ratio when parametric models are correctly specified.
  • Existing estimators exhibit bias under incorrect model assumptions, a limitation addressed by the new index.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed robust effect size index offers greater generalizability and uniformity across diverse statistical models.
  • This invariance has the potential to significantly enhance the consistency and clarity of effect size communication within the behavioral sciences.
  • The index facilitates standardized power and sample size calculations, aiding robust study design.