Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ASO Author Reflections: Timing of Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction-Expanding Access without Compromising Technical Success.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Timing of Surgical Axillary Staging and Impact on Technical Success of Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction Following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

TMR and RPNI Sustainably Reduce Long-Term Pain and Opioid Use after Oncologic Amputation: A Comparison With Untreated Amputees.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Local amiodarone delivery via an extracellular collagen matrix patch to reduce new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation.

JTCVS open·2026
Same author

Case Report: Complete response to the concurrent neoadjuvant radiation therapy and pembrolizumab in a locally recurrent, chemotherapy-refractory undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of bone.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Lip Reconstruction Following Cancer Resection.

Head & neck·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts
10:32

Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts

Published on: March 26, 2015

10.7K

Clinically available reinforcing materials for soft tissue reconstruction.

Kevin G Cornwell1, Charles Bret Jessee1, David M Adelman2

  • 1Integra Life Sciences, Boston, MA 01217, Massachusetts, USA.

British Journal of Hospital Medicine (London, England : 2005)
|April 3, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Choosing the right soft tissue reinforcement mesh is complex. This review focuses on material science attributes to guide clinicians in selecting optimal mesh features for patient needs and surgical outcomes.

More Related Videos

Minced Tissue in Compressed Collagen: A Cell-containing Biotransplant for Single-staged Reconstructive Repair
09:43

Minced Tissue in Compressed Collagen: A Cell-containing Biotransplant for Single-staged Reconstructive Repair

Published on: February 24, 2016

10.4K
Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
08:41

Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials

Published on: August 13, 2019

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts
10:32

Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts

Published on: March 26, 2015

10.7K
Minced Tissue in Compressed Collagen: A Cell-containing Biotransplant for Single-staged Reconstructive Repair
09:43

Minced Tissue in Compressed Collagen: A Cell-containing Biotransplant for Single-staged Reconstructive Repair

Published on: February 24, 2016

10.4K
Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
08:41

Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials

Published on: August 13, 2019

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • The field of soft tissue reinforcement materials is rapidly evolving, presenting challenges for clinicians due to numerous available options.
  • Current mesh classifications are often inadequate, grouping diverse materials and not fully reflecting clinical functionality.
  • A materials science perspective is needed to better understand and utilize these implants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a materials science-based review of soft tissue reinforcement meshes.
  • To enhance clinical decision-making in selecting appropriate mesh features and designs.
  • To align material attributes with patient needs, surgical procedures, and clinical requirements.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review focusing on materials science properties of soft tissue reinforcement meshes.
  • Analysis of physical, mechanical, and biological attributes relevant to clinical application.
  • Evaluation of existing classification systems and their limitations.

Main Results:

  • Identified key material attributes impacting surgical procedures and immediate postoperative mechanical stability.
  • Highlighted critical post-implantation properties including reinforcement duration, tissue integration strength, and infection risk.
  • Emphasized the need for a classification system that considers functional clinical utility.

Conclusions:

  • A materials science-driven approach is crucial for optimizing the selection of soft tissue reinforcement meshes.
  • Understanding specific material attributes allows for better tailoring of implants to clinical scenarios.
  • Improved material characterization and classification can lead to enhanced patient outcomes and reduced complications.