Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
How does deprivation influence secondary care costs after hip fracture?
J Glynn1, W Hollingworth2, A Bhimjiyani3
1Health Economics at Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 1-5 Whiteladies Road, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK. joel.glynn@bristol.ac.uk.
Abstract:
We studied the association between deprivation and healthcare costs after hip fracture. Hospital costs in the year following hip fracture were £1120 higher for those living in more deprived areas. Most of this difference was explained by pre-existing health inequalities which should be targeted to reduce this disparity.
Introduction:
To quantify differences in hospital costs following hip fracture between those living in higher and lower deprivation areas of England, we investigate pre- and post-fracture variables that explain the association.
Methods:
We used English Hospital Episodes Statistics linked to the National Hip Fracture Database (April 2011-March 2015) and national mortality data to identify patients admitted with hip fracture aged 60+ years. Hospital care was costed using 2017/2018 national reference costs, by index of multiple deprivation quintile. Three generalised linear model regressions estimated associations between deprivation and costs and the pre- and post-fracture variables that mediate this relationship.
Results:
Patients from the most deprived areas had higher hospital costs in the year post-fracture (£1,120; 95% CI £993 to £1,247) than those from the least deprived areas. If all patients could have incurred similar costs to those in the least deprived quintile, this would equate to an annual reduction in expenditure of £28.8 million. Pre-fracture characteristics, particularly comorbidities and anaesthetic risk grade, accounted for approximately 50% of the association between deprivation and costs. No evidence was found that post-fracture variables, such as transfer to a residential or nursing home, contributed to the association between deprivation and costs.
Conclusions:
Socioeconomic inequalities are associated with substantial costs for the NHS after hip fracture. We did not identify post-fracture targets for intervention to reduce the impact of inequalities on post-fracture costs. The case for interventions to reduce comorbid conditions, improve health-related behaviours and prevent falls in deprived areas is clear but challenging to implement.
More Related Videos
07:43In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Secondary Healthcare System
Restorative Care
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Traditional Level Of Health Care System
The preventive healthcare service includes tests for screening. Preventive health care services include identifying and reducing disease risk...
Tertiary Healthcare System
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History: