Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.2K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.2K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.4K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.6K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.6K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

44.0K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
44.0K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

9.8K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
9.8K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

1.0K
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scoring gene importance by interpreting single-cell foundation models.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same author

Decoding sequence determinants of gene expression in diverse cellular and disease states.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

Digitized dataset of aqueous acid dissociation constants.

RSC advances·2026
Same author

Partitioning Parameters of <i>N-</i>Nitrosamines: An Intercomparison of Determination Methods.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026
Same author

Predictive Chemical Kinetic Modeling: Where We Succeed, Where We Struggle, and What Comes Next.

ACS engineering Au·2026
Same author

Detailed kinetic model for combustion of NH<sub>3</sub>/H<sub>2</sub> blends.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same journal

Correction to "AstraMEV (AI-Guided Structural Assembly of Multi-Epitope Vaccines) Against Infectious Bronchitis Virus".

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

MolPy: A Large Language Model-Friendly Toolkit for Reactive Topology Editing in Polymer Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Molecular Mechanisms of KIT Receptor Dimerization and Oncogenic Activation Revealed by Multiscale Simulations.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

Structural and Thermodynamic Discrimination between Agonists and Antagonists of Retinoic Acid Receptor γ and the Vitamin D Receptor.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

PACEff Builder: An Efficient Platform for Constructing PACE Hybrid-Resolution Models for Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Aqueous Protein, Peptide Assembly, and Membrane Protein Systems.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same journal

TransKla: A Local-Global Cross-Attention Based Transformer Approach for Prediction of Lysine Lactylation Sites.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.5K

Evaluating Scalable Uncertainty Estimation Methods for Deep Learning-Based Molecular Property Prediction.

Gabriele Scalia1,2, Colin A Grambow1, Barbara Pernici2

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|April 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep Ensembles and bootstrapping effectively quantify uncertainty in graph convolutional neural networks (GCNNs) for molecular property prediction, outperforming MC-dropout. This research clarifies aleatoric/epistemic uncertainty and its impact on model reliability.

More Related Videos

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K
Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.5K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K
Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons
08:04

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry and cheminformatics
  • Machine learning and artificial intelligence
  • Deep learning for scientific applications

Background:

  • Deep neural networks (DNNs), particularly graph convolutional neural networks (GCNNs), achieve high accuracy in molecular property prediction.
  • Quantifying prediction uncertainty remains a critical challenge, especially for out-of-domain molecules, impacting model reliability.
  • Scalable methods for uncertainty estimation in DNNs are needed, with few evaluated for molecular property prediction tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively compare scalable uncertainty estimation techniques for GCNNs in molecular property prediction.
  • To introduce criteria for evaluating different aspects of uncertainty (aleatoric and epistemic).
  • To assess the impact of uncertainty quantification on error reduction.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical comparison of MC-dropout, Deep Ensembles, and bootstrapping within a unified framework separating aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty.
  • Experimental evaluation of these methods on public molecular property datasets.
  • Quantitative assessment using defined criteria for uncertainty aspects and error reduction.

Main Results:

  • Deep Ensembles and bootstrapping consistently demonstrated superior performance compared to MC-dropout for uncertainty estimation in GCNNs.
  • The study provides a quantitative analysis of the performance of different uncertainty estimation methods and their effect on error reduction.
  • Findings highlight context-specific advantages and disadvantages of each method and the challenge of out-of-domain uncertainty.

Conclusions:

  • Deep Ensembles and bootstrapping are effective and scalable methods for uncertainty quantification in GCNN-based molecular property prediction.
  • The research enhances understanding of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in relation to dataset features.
  • Addressing out-of-domain uncertainty remains a significant challenge in molecular property prediction using DNNs.