Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 25, 2025
Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Validation of an algorithm based on administrative data to detect new onset of atrial fibrillation after cardiac
Jonathan Bourgon Labelle1,2,3,4, Paul Farand5,6,7, Christian Vincelette6,7,8
1Division of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada. jonathan.bourgon.labelle@usherbrooke.ca.
Introduction:
Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a frequent complication of cardiac surgery associated with important morbidity, mortality, and costs. To assess the effectiveness of preventive interventions, an important prerequisite is to have access to accurate measures of POAF incidence. The aim of this study was to develop and validate such a measure.
Methods:
A validation study was conducted at two large Canadian university health centers. First, a random sample of 976 (10.4%) patients who had cardiac surgery at these sites between 2010 and 2016 was generated. Then, a reference standard assessment of their medical records was performed to determine their true POAF status on discharge (positive/negative). The accuracy of various algorithms combining diagnostic and procedure codes from: 1) the current hospitalization, and 2) hospitalizations up to 6 years before the current hospitalization was assessed in comparison with the reference standard. Overall and site-specific estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative (NPV) predictive values were generated, along with their 95%CIs.
Results:
Upon manual review, 324 (33.2%) patients were POAF-positive. Our best-performing algorithm combining data from both sites used a look-back window of 6 years to exclude patients previously known for AF. This algorithm achieved 70.4% sensitivity (95%CI: 65.1-75.3), 86.0% specificity (95%CI: 83.1-88.6), 71.5% PPV (95%CI: 66.2-76.4), and 85.4% NPV (95%CI: 82.5-88.0). However, significant site-specific differences in sensitivity and NPV were observed.
Conclusion:
An algorithm based on administrative data can identify POAF patients with moderate accuracy. However, site-specific variations in coding practices have significant impact on accuracy.
