Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

10.7K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
10.7K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.3K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.3K
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.5K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.5K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

56.7K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
56.7K
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

59.5K
Overview
59.5K
Proofreading01:31

Proofreading

8.5K
Synthesis of new DNA molecules is carried out by the enzyme DNA polymerase, which adds nucleotides on the daughter strand complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity to add the correct base and ensures fidelity during DNA replication. Furthermore,  it exhibits proofreading activity during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...
8.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thoughts on Writing for Review: An NSF Program Officer's Perspective.

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometryยท2020
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.2K

Thoughts on Writing for Review: A Former JASMS Associate Editor's Perspective.

Kelsey D Cook1

  • 1Department of Chemistry University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-1600, United States.

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
|April 7, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This account offers advice for authors and reviewers on scientific manuscript preparation, drawing from extensive editorial experience at the Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (JASMS). Learn common mistakes to avoid for successful scientific publication.

More Related Videos

Paw-Dragging: a Novel, Sensitive Analysis of the Mouse Cylinder Test
09:14

Paw-Dragging: a Novel, Sensitive Analysis of the Mouse Cylinder Test

Published on: April 29, 2015

24.6K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 25, 2025

Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.2K
Paw-Dragging: a Novel, Sensitive Analysis of the Mouse Cylinder Test
09:14

Paw-Dragging: a Novel, Sensitive Analysis of the Mouse Cylinder Test

Published on: April 29, 2015

24.6K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.5K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific communication
  • Manuscript preparation
  • Peer review process

Background:

  • Extensive editorial experience informs this perspective.
  • 40-year academic career including 27 years as Associate Editor for the Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (JASMS).
  • Nearly 14 years of experience at the National Science Foundation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide observations and advice on writing for scientific review.
  • To offer insights into editor and reviewer expectations for manuscripts.
  • To highlight common mistakes to avoid in scientific writing.

Main Methods:

  • Perspective piece based on long-term editorial experience.
  • Analysis of common issues encountered in manuscript review.
  • Focus on guidelines relevant to the Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (JASMS).

Main Results:

  • Identification of key elements editors and reviewers seek in manuscripts.
  • Cataloging of frequent errors that hinder publication.
  • Generalizable advice applicable beyond JASMS.

Conclusions:

  • Adherence to specific journal guidelines and general best practices improves manuscript quality.
  • Understanding editor/reviewer perspectives aids authors in successful scientific communication.
  • Avoiding common pitfalls is crucial for efficient and effective peer review.