Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.5K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.5K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.3K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.3K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

10.6K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
10.6K
SBAR II: Application of SBAR01:14

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

5.5K
SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
5.5K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

42.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
42.8K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

56.6K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
56.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thoughts on Writing for Review: A Former <i>JASMS</i> Associate Editor's Perspective.

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.2K

Thoughts on Writing for Review: An NSF Program Officer's Perspective.

Kelsey D Cook1

  • 1National Science Foundation Division of Chemistry, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22207, United States.

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
|June 9, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This account offers insights from a 40-year academic career, focusing on National Science Foundation (NSF) proposal review and common mistakes. It provides guidance for both grant applicants and reviewers.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activities of Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Surfaces In Vitro
11:52

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activities of Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Surfaces In Vitro

Published on: April 21, 2023

3.7K
Co-localizing Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy with Other Microscopies and Spectroscopies: Selected Applications in Corrosion Characterization of Alloys
12:18

Co-localizing Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy with Other Microscopies and Spectroscopies: Selected Applications in Corrosion Characterization of Alloys

Published on: June 27, 2022

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.2K
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activities of Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Surfaces In Vitro
11:52

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activities of Nanoparticles and Nanostructured Surfaces In Vitro

Published on: April 21, 2023

3.7K
Co-localizing Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy with Other Microscopies and Spectroscopies: Selected Applications in Corrosion Characterization of Alloys
12:18

Co-localizing Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy with Other Microscopies and Spectroscopies: Selected Applications in Corrosion Characterization of Alloys

Published on: June 27, 2022

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Funding
  • Grant Writing
  • Research Administration

Background:

  • Leverages 40 years of academic experience.
  • Includes over 14 years as a National Science Foundation (NSF) program officer.
  • Draws on 27 years as an Associate Editor for the Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a program officer's perspective on scientific grant proposals.
  • To offer advice on what reviewers seek in proposals.
  • To highlight common, avoidable mistakes in proposal writing.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of extensive experience in grant review and editorial roles.
  • Focus on National Science Foundation (NSF) guidelines.
  • Generalizable advice for proposal authors and reviewers.

Main Results:

  • Identifies key criteria for successful grant proposals from a reviewer's standpoint.
  • Details frequent errors that hinder proposal success.
  • Offers actionable recommendations for improving proposal quality.

Conclusions:

  • Effective grant writing requires understanding reviewer expectations.
  • Avoiding common pitfalls is crucial for securing research funding.
  • This perspective serves as a valuable resource for researchers and reviewers alike.