Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
ADVANCE in context: The benefits, risks and feasibility of providing intensive glycaemic control based on gliclazide
1School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract:
In the last 3 decades, four large multicentre, randomized clinical trials of patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS, ADVANCE, ACCORD and VADT) have studied different approaches to achieving near normal glycaemic targets. Each was designed against a background of international and national guidelines recommending glycaemic targets of 6.5% or less to prevent diabetic complications. Collectively, these clinical trials provide the most robust evidence of the potential vascular benefits and risks of more versus less glucose control and provide critical insights into how therapies are used. In this review, the glucose-lowering approach used by the ADVANCE trial is considered and compared with those used by the other trials.
Insights
Four major trials, including the ADVANCE study, examined intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. This review compares the ADVANCE trial
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Diabetes Research
Background:
- International guidelines recommend HbA1c targets of 6.5% or less for type 2 diabetes patients to prevent complications.
- Four large multicenter randomized clinical trials (UKPDS, ADVANCE, ACCORD, VADT) have investigated intensive glucose control strategies over the past 30 years.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and compare the glucose-lowering approach used in the ADVANCE trial with those employed in other major glycaemic control studies.
- To provide critical insights into the benefits and risks of intensive versus standard glucose control in type 2 diabetes.
Main Methods:
- Comparative review of four major randomized clinical trials: UKPDS, ADVANCE, ACCORD, and VADT.
- Analysis of glucose-lowering strategies and their impact on vascular outcomes.
Main Results:
- The trials collectively offer robust evidence on the vascular benefits and risks associated with different glucose control intensities.
- Insights into the practical application and outcomes of various therapeutic approaches.
Conclusions:
- Understanding the nuances of glucose-lowering strategies is crucial for optimizing patient care in type 2 diabetes.
- The ADVANCE trial's approach provides a valuable point of comparison for evaluating intensive glycaemic control in diabetes management.
Related Concept Videos
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Glucagon-like Receptor Agonists
GLP-1, when administered in high doses intravenously, triggers insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon release, slows gastric emptying, reduces food intake, and restores normal insulin secretion. However, its rapid inactivation by...
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...

