Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025
Identification and Protection of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve during Transoral Robotic Thyroidectomy
Published on: October 24, 2025
Novel technique for lymphadenectomy along left recurrent laryngeal nerve during thoracoscopic esophagectomy
Wen-Shu Chen1, Li-Huan Zhu2, Wu-Jin Li2
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China. doctorcws@163.com.
Background:
In esophageal squamous carcinoma, lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is recommended owing to its highly metastatic potential. However, this procedure is difficult due to limited working space in the left upper mediastinum, and increases postoperative complications.
Aim:
To present a novel method for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN during thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the semi-prone position.
Methods:
The fundamental concept of this novel method is to exfoliate a bilateral pedicled nerve flap, which is a two-dimensional membrane, which includes the left RLN, lymph nodes (LNs) along the left RLN, and tracheoesophageal vessels, by suspending the esophagus to the dorsal side and pushing the trachea to the ventral side (named "bilateral exposure method"). Then, the hollow-out method is performed to transform the two-dimensional membrane to a three-dimensional structure, in which the left RLN and tracheoesophageal vessels are easily distinguished and preserved during lymphadenectomy along the left RLN. This novel method was retrospectively evaluated in 116 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma from August 2016 to February 2018.
Results:
There were 58 patients in each group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of age, gender, postoperative pneumonia, anastomotic fistula, and postoperative hospitalization. However, the number of dissected LNs along the left RLN in this novel method was significantly higher than that in the conventional method (4.17 ± 0.359 vs 2.93 ± 0.463, P = 0.0447). Moreover, the operative time and the rate of postoperative hoarseness in the novel method were significantly lower than those in the conventional method (306.0 ± 6.774 vs 335.2 ± 7.750, P = 0.0054; 4/58 vs 12/58, P = 0.0312).
Conclusion:
This novel method for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN during thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the semi-prone position is much safer and more effective.
