Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 24, 2025

10:37
Induction and Analysis of Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition
Published on: August 27, 2013
36.3K
Comparative Study of Transcriptomics-Based Scoring Metrics for the Epithelial-Hybrid-Mesenchymal Spectrum
Priyanka Chakraborty1, Jason T George2,3, Shubham Tripathi2,4,5
1Centre for BioSystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
|April 9, 2020
Summary
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is crucial in cancer. This study compares methods to quantify EMT status, finding the MLR metric best distinguishes hybrid phenotypes and offers advantages for single-cell analysis.
Area of Science:
- Cellular Biology
- Cancer Research
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a cellular process involved in development, wound healing, and cancer metastasis.
- Cancer cells undergoing EMT display increased drug resistance, tumor-initiation potential, and immune evasion.
- Hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal (E/M) phenotypes can be more aggressive than pure epithelial or mesenchymal states, impacting patient prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare existing transcriptomics-based metrics for quantifying EMT status in cancer cells.
- To evaluate the accuracy of these metrics in identifying hybrid E/M phenotypes.
- To identify the most effective method for assessing EMT continuum and hybrid states.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of three distinct transcriptomics signature-based metrics for scoring EMT on a continuum.
- Analysis of EMT variability across different tumor types.
- Utilizing multinomial logistic regression (MLR) to distinguish pure hybrid E/M cells from mixtures.
Main Results:
- The three compared EMT scoring methods showed good concordance in quantifying EMT extent.
- Significant variability in EMT extent was observed across tumor types, with some enriched for hybrid E/M signatures.
- The MLR-based metric effectively distinguished pure hybrid E/M cells from mixed E/M populations.
Conclusions:
- All three methods provide a general trend of EMT status, but MLR offers superior resolution for hybrid E/M phenotypes.
- The MLR method is advantageous due to its use of fewer predictors and its ability to differentiate pure hybrid E/M cells at the single-cell level from mixed populations.

